Reorienting Medical Dispute Resolution: MDP, ADR, and Litigation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v12i3.5579

Keywords:

Medical Disputes, Health Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the structure of the medical dispute resolution mechanism as stipulated in Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health and to examine its implications for the legal protection of patients, medical personnel, health workers, and health care facilities.

The methods used in this study include a normative legal approach, incorporating both a statutory and conceptual framework, through a systematic review of Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, Ministry of Health Regulation No. 3 of 2025, Ministry of Health Regulation No. 4 of 2025, Constitutional Court Decision No. 156/PUU-XXII/2024, and relevant scientific literature.

The novelty of this research lies in the formulation of the Multi-Layer Medical Dispute Resolution Model, which integrates the identification of medical incidents, complaints and clarifications, disciplinary enforcement by the Professional Disciplinary Council, alternative dispute resolution, and the potential for administrative, civil, and criminal liability into a single normative framework.

The results of the research indicate that prioritizing out-of-court dispute resolution mechanisms forms a multi-layered model oriented toward dialogue, professional evaluation, and redress; however, its effectiveness is largely determined by the clarity of procedures, the capacity of dispute resolution institutions, and the guarantee of balanced access for the parties so that legal protection and access to justice are realized proportionally.

The conclusion emphasizes that the normative design of the Health Law has the potential to strengthen legal protection in the field of medical disputes, provided it is accompanied by the strengthening of subsidiary regulations, institutional frameworks, and implementation practices that ensure non-litigation mechanisms truly serve as corrective and restorative measures, rather than mere procedural formalities that hinder the fulfillment of the parties’ legal rights.

References

Alim, Nur. “Mekanisme Penyelesaian Perselisihan Medis Dengan Prinsip Restorative Justice Di Indonesia= Medical Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Using the Principles of Restorative Justice In Indonesia.” Universitas Hasanuddin, 2025. https://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/52607/.

Aulia, Haniv, and Hudi Yusuf. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023.” Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia 1, no. 9 (2024): 4887–95. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jiic/article/view/1388.

Camellia, Lintang Zandra, and Adhitya Widya Kartika. “Aspek Keperdataan Dalam Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Antara Pasien Dengan Tenaga Medis Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kesehatan.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 54, no. 3 (2024): 573–94. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol54.no3.1647.

Darwis, Muhammad. “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Kedudukan Rekam Medis Dan Informed Consent Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Kasus Malpraktek.” Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada, 2024.

———. “Dissecting Justice: The Legal Significance of Medical Records and Informed Consent in Malpractice Cases” 6, no. 3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v6i3.1092.

Darwis, Muhammad, and Rahmat Amir. “Transaksi Trapeutik Sebagai Pertanggungjawaban Dokter Terhadap Pasien.” Jurnal Litigasi Amsir 10, no. 1 (2022): 61–71. http://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/155.

Irwansyah, Ahsan Yunus. Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Edisi Revisi). Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, Cet. Vol. 4. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2021.

Juliardi, Budi, Yoan Barbara Runtunuwu, Mohammad Hendy Musthofa, Andi Darmawansya TL, Arini Asriyani, Raju Moh Hazmi, Muh Akbar Fhad Syahril, Tri Eka Saputra, Zuhdi Arman, and Muhammad A Rauf. Metode Penelitian Hukum. CV. Gita Lentera, 2023.

Kurniawati, Saadah, and Fahmi Fahmi. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia.” INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 2 (2023): 12234–44.

Maskanah, Ummi. “Implementation of Restorative Justice in Medical Dispute Resolution.” Jurnal Aisyah Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan 8, no. 2 (2023): 10–23. https://doi.org/10.30604/jika.v8i2.1988.

Maulana, Rafan Darodjat; Mursal. “Paradigma Baru Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis.” Hukum Online, 2024.

Miarsa, Fajar Rachmad Dwi, and Danggur Feliks. “Restorative Justice Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Di Puskesmas.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 4, no. 2 (2026): 4681–4702. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.4964.

Ndeadmin. “Sengketa Medis.” Pandewal, 2021.

Nugroho, Susanti Adi, and M H Sh. Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Kencana, 2017.

Ramadhani, Elzan Syahza Stesia, and Hudi Yusuf. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Sengketa Medis Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara 1, no. 5 (2024): 7964–71. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jicn/article/view/1405.

Riyanto, Ontran Sumantri. “Dekonstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Dalam Sengketa Medis: Perspektif Restorative Justice Sebagai Paradigma Baru Perlindungan Ham Bagi Tenaga Medis.” Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia 3, no. 2 (2024): 78–89. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.4451.

Subudhi, I Ketut Raka, and Luh Nyoman Alit Aryani. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Atas Kasus Pelayanan Buruk Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Menurut Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan.” JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 6, no. 1 (2024): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v6i1.3707.

———. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Atas Kasus Pelayanan Buruk Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Menurut Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan.” JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 6, no. 1 (2024): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v6i1.3707.

Sudarmanto, Sudarmanto, and Meilan Arsanti. “Problematika Pembuktian Dalam Sengketa Medis (Analisis Putusan PN Cikarang NO. 120/Pdt. G. 2019/PN Ckr).” Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 3, no. 1 (2025): 76–87. https://ejournal.mejailmiah.com/index.php/adagium/article/view/64.

Sun, Hemestiana Matilda, and Hudi Yusuf. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kelalaian Medik Melalui Mediasi Dan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia (MKDKI).” Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia 1, no. 9 (2024): 4958–67.

Syarif, Muhammad, Rizki Ramadhani, Muhammad Aji Wisnu Graha, Tri Yanuaria, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, Nur Asmah, Muh Akbar Fhad Syahril, Rizky Dwi Utami, Ahmad Rustan, and Hanry Setiawan Nasution. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Get Press, 2024.

Widjayanti, Trisna. “Manajemen Risiko: Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis pada UU Kesehatan No 17 Tahun 2023.” Kumparan.Com, April 2023.

Downloads

Published

21-08-2026

How to Cite

Darwis, M., Kriviņš, A., & Al-Maliki, A. I. (2026). Reorienting Medical Dispute Resolution: MDP, ADR, and Litigation. JUSTISI, 12(3), 773–798. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v12i3.5579

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.