Breaking The Promise to Marry Unlawful Acts or Default
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i2.2481Keywords:
Marriage promise, Unlawful act, DefaultAbstract
This study aims to find civil law arrangements regarding the juridical analysis of breaking a promise to marry or what is commonly referred to as Broken Marriage Promises as an unlawful act. What are the legal consequences of breaking a marriage promise as unlawful? This study uses a normative legal research type with a statutory approach. The types and sources of legal materials use primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Analysis of legal materials uses deductive logical reasoning, which is studied from a qualitative perspective. The results of the study show that breaking a promise to marry or commonly called promises of marriage as an unlawful act, is regulated in Article 58 of the Civil Code and several judges' decisions such as Supreme Court Decision Number 3191 K/Pdt/1984, Supreme Court Decision Number 3277 K/Pdt/2000, Decision of the Supreme Court Number 1644 K/Pdt/2020. The legal consequences of breaking a marriage promise as an unlawful act, namely if a person suffers a loss due to breaking of the marriage promise, both material and immaterial losses, then he can be sued for compensation following the loss suffered if the element of the unlawful act is fulfilled according to Article 1365 of the Civil Code.
References
Ashshofa, Burhan. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2005.
Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus. “Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian.” PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2001.
Moegni, Djojodirjo M A. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.” Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1979.
Nawi, Syahruddin. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Versus Penelitian Hukum Empiris. 5th ed. Makassar: PT.Umitoha Ukhuwah Grafika, 2017.
Nurfitrah, Mesya. “Janji Menikahi Yang Mengikat Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda.” Jurnal USM Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 79–93.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.” Jakarta: Sumur Bandung, 1984.
Thalib, Sayuti. “Hukum Kekeluargaan Indonesia (Cetakan Kedua).” Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, 2009.
Fahiroh, Wirda. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Korban Tidak Terpenuhinya Janji Kawin Perspektif KUH Perdata (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1644 K/Pdt/2020).” INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI MADURA, 2022.
Hasmawati, Hasmawati, and Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril. “The Effectiveness of Mediation Process to Press Divorce Rates.” Amsir Law Journal 1, no. 2 (April 24, 2020): 78–84. https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v1i2.26.
Jevera, Vania Madeline, Fajar Sugianto, and Sanggup Leonard Agustian. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pengingkaran Janji Kawin.” Tanjungpura Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2022): 195–212.
Josviranto, Micael, Patrick Sanry Mero Nurak, Garvatius Portasius Mude, Alfonsus Hilarius Ase, and Maria Guntilda Plea. “Analisis Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Maumere Nomor 8/Pdt. G/2019/Pn MME Tentang Wanprestasi DalamIngkar Janji Menikah.” Gema Wiralodra 12, no. 2 (2021): 320–31.
Mantili, Rai, and Sutanto Sutanto. “Kumulasi Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Gugatan Wanprestasi Dalam Kajian Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia.” Dialogia Iuridica 10, no. 2 (2019): 1–18.
Nurfitrah, Mesya. “Janji Menikahi Yang Mengikat Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda.” Jurnal USM Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 79–93.
Syahril, Muh Akbar Fhad. “The Effectiveness Of The Annulment Of Marriage Due To Impersonation And Its Legal Consequence.” IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS 23, no. 2 (2018): 2279–0845. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2302023944.
Wulandari, Devi Dwi. “Analisis Yuridis Ingkar Janji Kawin Sebagai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.” Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada., 2022.
Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Auliah Ambarwati, Muh. Fadli Faisal Rasyid, Saharuddin Saharuddin, Devi Dwi Wulandari, Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
