Penggunaan Bukti Tidak Langsung Dan Penerapan Leniency Program Di Kasus Kartel Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v8i1.1400Keywords:
Cartel, Indirect Evidence, Leniency Program.Abstract
Cartels as a Form of Unfair Business Competition KPPU often has difficulty proving it through direct evidence in accordance with Law No. 5/1999, so the alternative used by KPPU to obtain evidence is indirect evidence, and in practice this indirect evidence It is also not easy because it has not been regulated in Law No. 5/1999 so that the Supreme Court has not given any information regarding indirect evidence. The research method used by the author is normative research using library research to obtain data, and there is a need for clarity regarding procedural law from the KPPU. And the Authority of the KPPU in order to facilitate the handling of the KPPU on the Cartel Problem in Indonesia and amid the uncertainty of indirect evidence, the leniency of the program can also be used as an alternative in proving the occurrence of cartel actions carried out by business actors, and the application of evidence is not This directly was also adopted by other countries as well as the leniency program, and Indonesia also needs to follow this step to reduce cartels in Indonesia.
References
BUKU
Nadapdap , Binoto.2019. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Bukti Tidak Langsung (Indirect
Evidence ) Versus Tembok Kartel , Permata Aksara, Kertas Bookpaper
JURNAL
Nindriani, A. PROSPEK LENIENCY PROGRAM SEBAGAI UPAYA
MENGUNGKAP PRAKTIK KARTEL DALAM HUKUM PERSAINGAN
USAHA DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Privat Law, 8(1), 28-35.
Anggraini, A. M. T. (2016). Penggunaan Bukti Ekonomi Dalam Kartel Berdasarkan
Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, 3(3), 1-25.
Mulyadi, D., & Rusydi, I. (2017). Efektivitas peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan
Usaha (KPPU) dalam penanganan kasus persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Jurnal
Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 5(1), 81-95.
Wulandari, I., & Ibrahim, R. (2013). Analisis Kewenangan KPPU Melakukan
Penyelidikan dan/atau Pemeriksaan yang Diatur dalam Pasal 36 UU No. 5
Tahun 1999. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 1-14..
Simanjuntak, F. L. (2018). Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim Agung Republik
Indonesia Dalam Menangani Kasasi Perkara Kartel Putusan KPPU Yang
Menggunakan Alat Bukti Tidak Langsung (Indirect Evidence). Madani Legal
Review, 2(1), 71-101.
Fitriyah, S., & Sulistiyono, A. (2018). Analisis Yuridis dan Penggunaan Indirect
Evidence dalam Kasus Kartel Sepeda Motor di Indonesia ditinjau dari Hukum
Persaingan Usaha Indonesia. Jurnal Privat Law, 6(1), 34-45.
Putra, I. P. A. S., Wati, N. L. M. M., & Sutama, I. N. (2020). Pengaruh Sistem
Kartel terhadap Stabilitas Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jurnal Preferensi
Hukum, 1(2), 116-120.
PERATURAN PERUNDANG UNDANGAN
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan
Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat .
