Reformulation of Electronic Evidence in Forex Trading Manipulation Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i2.4264Keywords:
Reformulation, Electronic evidence, Forex tradingAbstract
The aim of this study is to find the root causes of problems in legislation and weaknesses of law enforcement officials in maintaining the validity and authenticity of electronic evidence in cases of forex trading manipulation, as well as to reformulate relevant laws after identifying the root causes of the problems.
The method used in this study is a normative juridical method using a legislative approach to analyze regulations related to the examination of electronic evidence and a conceptual approach in reformulating relevant regulations. Data was obtained through analysis of legislation, literature, and relevant legal doctrines.
The novelty of this research lies in its focus on regulatory reform related to electronic evidence in forex trading manipulation crimes. It not only involves reformulation but also determines how the novel aspects of legal practice should be implemented.
The results of this study indicate that regulations on electronic evidence, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI) in forex trading, still need to be reformulated to accommodate technological developments, especially in terms of authenticity. The lack of knowledge of law enforcement officials in the field of technology is also a priority in determining how law enforcement officials carry out their duties as investigators in technology-based crimes.
The study concludes that the existing weak regulations and the lack of knowledge of law enforcement officials in maintaining the validity of electronic evidence in cases of manipulation need to be strengthened through the reformulation of laws and regulations and the expansion of knowledge in technology for law enforcement officials. With more adaptive and comprehensive reformulation, the evidence system in forex trading cases can be more effective and provide better legal protection.
References
Adhi, I Putu Krisna. “Rekaman Elektronik Personal Chat Pada Social Media Sebagai Alat Bukti.” Media Iuris 1, no. 3 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v1i3.9829
Akbar, Aidil, and Fadillah Sabri. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana Secara Elektronik.” Soumatera Law Review 4, no. 1 (2021): 120–34. Retrieved by https://scientiacatalysis.org/index.php/soumlaw/article/view/367
Akbar, M D. “Pemanfaatan Dan Permasalahan Artificial Intelligence Dalam Kehidupan Manusia Serta Pengaturannya Secara Hukum.” Media Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 2 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12169651
Asimah, D. “Menjawab Kendala Pembuktian Dalam Penerapan Alat Bukti Elektronik To Overcome The Constraints Of Proof In The Application Of Electronic Evidence.” Puslitbang Hukum Dan Peradilan Ditjen Badan 3, no. 2 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.322020.97-110.
Ardiansyah, Yusuf Amir, Dandi Umlati, Ewi Yasdin, Muhammad Faisal, and Amirul Adli Habib Hasibuan. “Analysis the Implementation Ministry of Transportation Decree Number KM 65 of 2009 in Shipping Crimes”. JUSTISI 11 (2) 2025 :333-45. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i2.3901.
BAPPEBTI. “PENGATURAN DAN PENINDAKAN DI BIDANG PERDAGANGAN BERJANGKA KOMODITI,” 2022. Diakses dari https://bappebti.go.id/bahan_literasi/detail/7271.
Buinei, Gerson Sem, Wahab Aznul Hidaya, and A. Faqih Mursid. “Restorative Justice Approach in Dealing With Crimes at Police Level (A Study at Polresta and Polres Sorong)”. Journal of Law Justice 2 (1) 2024 :1-12. https://doi.org/10.33506/jlj.v2i1.3250
Doni Muhammad Taufik Alias Doni Salmanan, Nomor 576/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Blb, Mahkamah Agung, 16 Desember 2022. Diakses dari https://paralegal.id/putusan/putusan-pengadilan-negeri-bale-bandung-nomor-576-pid-sus-2022-pn-blb/.
Eato, Y. N. “Keabsahan Alat Bukti Dan Barang Bukti Pada Perkara Pidana.” Lex Crimen 6, no. 2 (2017). Retrieved by https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/15346/14894.
Farosi, Mohamamd, and Widhi Cahyo Nugroho. “Investasi Ilegal Berkedok Robot Trading Menurut Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 2, no. 1 (2022): 590–603. Doi: https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i1.152.
Febryanti, A. C, I Darmawan, and R. Andreswari. “Pemodelan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Bidang Peminatan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Studi Kasus: Program Studi Sistem Informasi Universitas Telkom.” EProceedings of Engineering 4, no. 2 (2017). Retrieved by https://openlibrarypublications.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/engineering/article/view/1304/0.
Fitriati, Fitriati, Iyah Faniyah, and Nisep Rahmad. “Hambatan Teknis Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Manipulasi Informasi Elektronik Pada Polda Sumatera Barat.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 51, no. 4 (2022): 390–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.4.2022.390-400
Flora, Henny Saida, Kasmanto Rinaldi, Jusri Mudjrimin, Sitta Saraya, Yusrina Handayani, Ratna Jaya, Rudy Dwi Laksono, Johannes Johny Koynja, Louisa Yesami K, and Parningotan Malau. HUKUM PIDANA DI ERA DIGITAL. Batam: CV Rey Media Grafika, 2024. Retrieved by https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=zFcXEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Flora,+H.+S.,+SH,+M.,+Kn,+M.,+Kes,+M.+H.,+Kasmanto+Rinaldi,+S.+H.,+SI,+M.,+%26+SH,+M.+(2024).+Hukum+Pidana+Di+Era+Digital.+CV+Rey+Media+Grafika.24&ots=oLWrLQfnYK&sig=SQTSJZaJKcByY.
Isima, Nurlaila. “Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana.” Gorontalo Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 179–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v5i1.1999
Kumparan Bisnis. “Ombudsman Minta Bappebti Tuntaskan Kasus Investasi Bodong, Kerugian Rp 63 M.” kumparan.com, 2023. Diakses dari: https://kumparan.com/kumparanbisnis/ombudsman-minta-bappebti-tuntaskan-kasus-investasi-bodong-kerugian-rp-63-m-1zl2f4VXfEB.
Łągiewska, Magdalena. “Ethical Limits of Using Artificial Intelligence in Justice.” Knowledge Base of the Unversity Gdansk, 2024. Diakses dari: https://repozytorium.bg.ug.edu.pl/info/report/UOG87bdc797a40f49ccb416044a62bed0d0/.
Lakada, D. D. J. “Perkembangan Pengaturan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana (Kajian Hukum Tentang Cyber Crime).” Lex Crimen 12, no. 5 (2024). Retrieved by https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/59171/48105.
Masrichah, S. “Ancaman Dan Peluang Artificial Intelligence (AI).” Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora 3, no. 3 (2023): 83–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v3i3.1860.
Mufti, M. W, M. H Ikhsan, R Sani, and M Fauzan. “Urgensi Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Teknologi Berbasis Artificial Intelligence.” Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 1, no. 11 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11422903.
Nugroho, Adi. “HUKUM FOREX DI INDONESIA, ADAKAH YANG MENGATURNYA ?” www.foreximf.com, 2021. Diakses melalui: https://www.foreximf.com/blog/forex/hukum-forex.
P, Santos Wachjoe. “PENGGUNAAN INFORMASI ELEKTRONIK DAN DOKUMEN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI PERSIDANGAN THE USAGE OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND DOCUMENT AS COURT EVIDENCE.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 5, no. 1 (2016): 1–18. Retrieved by http://jurnalhukumdanperadilan.org/jhp/article/download/43/53.
Peraturan Kepala Polisi Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2009 tentang Tata Cara Persyaratan Permintaan Pemeriksaan Teknis Kriminalistik Tempat Kejadian Perkara dan Laboratoris Kriminalistik Barang Bukti Kepada Laboratorium Forensik Kepolisian Negara Repu. Diakses dari https://peraturan.infoasn.id/peraturan-kepala-kepolisian-negara-nomor-10-tahun-2009/.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaran Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik. Diakses dari https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/122030/pp-no-71-tahun-2019.
Pribadi, I. “Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Lex Renaissance 3, no. 1 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol3.iss1.art4.
Quora. “Apakah PT Simbiotik Multitalenta Indonesia (SMI) Ini Penipu? Benarkah PT.SMI Tidak Menjual Robot Trading Untuk Forex?” id.quora.com, n.d. Diakses dari https://id.quora.com/Apakah-PT-Simbiotik-Multitalenta-Indonesia-SMI-ini-penipu-Benarkah-PT-SMI-tidak-menjual-robot-trading-untuk-forex?q=PT SIM.
Rahmad, N., K. N. Arifah, D. Setiyawan, M. Ramli, and B. S Daud. “Efektivitas Bukti Elektronik Dalam Uu Ite Sebagai Perluasan Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Kuhap.” In Prosiding University Research Colloquium, 96–111, 2023. Retrieved by https://repository.urecol.org/index.php/proceeding/article/view/2279.
Rahul Pieter S. Yapen, Wahab Aznul Hidaya, and Muharuddin Muharuddin. “The Role of Correctional Institutions in the Development of Prisoners to Prevent Recidivism of Crimes in Sorong City”. Journal of Law Justice 2 (3) 2024 :162-76. https://doi.org/10.33506/jlj.v2i3.3354.
Ramiyanto, Ramiyanto. “Bukti Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 6, no. 3 (2017): 463–84. DOI: 10.25216/JHP.6.3.2017.463-484.
Santoso, Imelia. “Peraturan BAPPEBTI Yang Penting Dalam Trading Forex.” blog.hsb.co.id, 2025. Diakses dari https://blog.hsb.co.id/forex/regulasi-trading-forex-bappebti/.
Sari, Ni Putu Riyani Kartika, and Ni Luh Putu Geney Sri Kusuma. “Eksistensi Teori Pembuktian Positief Wettelijk Bewijstheorie Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata.” Jurnal Akses 12, no. 2 (2020): 132–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70358/jurnalakses.v12i2.695.
Supandi, H. “Modernisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Untuk Mendorong Kemajuan Peradaban Hukum Indonesia.” Professor Inauguration Speech Universitas Diponegoro, 2019. Retrieved by https://scispace.com/papers/modernisasi-peradilan-tata-usaha-negara-di-era-revolusi-21h5orvbsa.
Supardi. “Mengukur Kekuatan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Sintax Literate : Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 6, no. 5 (2021). Retrieved by http://jurnal.syntaxliterate.co.id/index.php/syntaxliterate/article/view/2724.
Surat Edaran Menteri Komunikasi dan Informasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2023 tentang Etika Kecerdasan Artifisial. Diakses dari https://jdih.komdigi.go.id/produk_hukum/view/id/883/t/surat+edaran+menteri+komunikasi+dan+informatika+nomor+9+tahun+2023.
The Conversation. “Dua Sisi EU AI Act: 10 Hal Yang Bisa Dipelajari Indonesia.” theconversation.com, 2024. Diakses dari https://theconversation.com/dua-sisi-eu-ai-act-10-hal-yang-bisa-dipelajari-indonesia-239824.
Tirtayasa. “AI Dan Politik: Pengaruh Algoritma Terhadap Kebijakan Publik.” kepripos.id, 2024. Diakses dari https://kepripos.id/ai-dan-politik-pengaruh-algoritma-terhadap-kebijakan-publik/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2011 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 1997 tentang Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi. Diakses dari https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39186/uu-no-10-tahun-2011.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Diakses dari https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38584/uu-no-7-tahun-2014.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/details/274494/uu-no-1-tahun-2024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Terra Whisnu Murti, Abdul Kholiq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
