Financial Services Authority Intervention as an Effort to Protect Bondholders in Corporations Declared Bankrupt by Commercial Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i1.3733Keywords:
Bondholders, Bankruptcy, Commercial Court, Financial Services Authority, LiquidationAbstract
This article discusses the fulfillment of rights for corporate bondholders declared bankrupt by the Commercial Court. No regulation can provide a comprehensive and integrated benchmark to ensure the protection of the rights of bondholder creditors, making this article important to discuss. This research aims to analyze the status of corporate bondholders declared bankrupt by the Commercial Court as creditors in the liquidation process, evaluate the forms of legal protection applied during the process, and assess the future application of the law in providing certainty of protection for bondholders. This research used normative legal research with statutory, historical, and futuristic approaches. The discussion results are carried out using an analysis perspective emphasizing deductive conclusions. Although corporate bondholders declared bankrupt by the Commercial Court have rights as creditors in the bankruptcy process, the legal protection is still ineffective. A regulatory gap results in uncertainty when implementing protection for bondholders. Revision of the Bankruptcy Law by including regulations regarding bondholders' creditors will provide certainty for the protection of creditors' rights, which can be derived in the Financial Services Authority (OJK) Regulation by enforcing supervision in the bankruptcy process in order to protect the interests of bondholders and ensure the stability of the economic development.References
Agustianto, Agustianto. “Pentingnya Transparansi Beneficial Ownership Oleh Korporasi”. JUSTISI 8 (2) 2022 :108-18. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v8i2.1678.
Annisa Affandy, and Toto Tohir Suriatmadja. “Pemenuhan Hak Investor Pada Obligasi Di Pasar Modal Ditinjau Dari Peraturan Pasar Modal.” Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, December 20, 2022, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrih.v2i2.1298.
Bangun, M Firman, Achmad Fitrian, and Gatut Hendro TW. “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Atas Pembagian Hasil Pemberesan Harta Pailit Oleh Kurator.” SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 9, no. 6 (September 15, 2022): 1769–82. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i5.27737.
Dewi, I Gusti Agung Istri Oktia Purnama, and Wirasila. “Peran Badan Arbitrase Pasar Modal Indonesia Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif.” Hukum Bisnis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana 12 (2015): 1–6.
Gusti Ndegong Madung, Otto. “Konsep Liberalisme Politik John Rawls Sebagai Jawaban Terhadap Tantangan Masyarakat Plural Dan Kritik Atasnya.” Diskursus - Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi Stf Driyarkara 18, no. 2 (October 6, 2022): 218–37. https://doi.org/10.36383/diskursus.v18i2.327.
Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode Dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2022.
Keladu, Yosef. “Kesamaan Proporsional Dan Ketidaksamaan Perlakuan Dalam Teori Keadilan Aristoteles.” Diskursus - Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi Stf Driyarkara 19, no. 1 (April 4, 2023): 54–78. https://doi.org/10.36383/diskursus.v19i1.347.
Latif, Inas Sofia, and Ilham Aji Pangestu. “Problematika Penyalahgunaan Bantuan Sosial Pada Masa Pandemi”. JUSTISI 8 (2) 2022 :95-107. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v8i2.1612.
M.Irsan, Nasarudin. Aspek Hukum Pasar Modal Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005.
Muhamamd Idris. “Pasar Modal: Pengertian, Sejarah, Dan Fungsinya . Diakses dari https://Money.Kompas.Com/Read/2021/08/31/195707526/Pasar-Modal-Pengertian-Sejarah-Dan-Fungsinya,” (2023, November 12).
Pakpahan, Elvira Fitriyani, Tyson Terbit Simbolon, Fibert Lovano, Elisah Elisah, and Giovanni Thomasia. “Konsep Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Wali Amanat Di Pasar Modal.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 14, no. 2 (December 26, 2019): 302–15. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v14i2.1921.
Pangihutan, Kaiji Natanael, Lastuti Abubakar, and Ema Rahmawati. “Tanggung Jawab Wali Amanat Kepada Pemegang Obligasi Dalam Hal Wali Amanat Melakukan Kelalaian Terhadap Kontrak Perwaliamanatan.” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, no. 2 (December 22, 2023): 2439–54. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.4059.
Putusan Pailit Terhadap Empat Anak Usaha Tps Itu Tertuang Dalam Surat Dari Tim Kurator No. 006/Tim Kurator-Sakti-Dp-Js-Ibu/V/2019 Pada 7 Mei 2019. Di akses dari https://www.idx.co.id/StaticData/NewsAndAnnouncement/ANNOUNCEMENTSTOCK/From_EREP/201905/8b6da838bd_8c952144b5.pdf ( 2023, Desember 12)
Renda, Fransiskus Xaverius. “Kebahagiaan Dalam Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill.” Proceedings of The National Conference on Indonesian Philosophy and Theology 1, no. 1 (March 1, 2023): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.24071/snf.v1i1.8368.
Ridduwan, Muhammad, and Fitriah Fitriah. “Kedudukan Hukum Kepailitan Dalam Sistem Hukum Bisnis Nasional.” Solusi 20, no. 3 (September 1, 2022): 328–40. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v20i3.638.
Risqitullah, Qodrad. “Kewajiban Dan Tanggungjawab Wali Amanat Terhadap Investor Pemegang Obligasi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 Tentang Pasar Modal.” Journal Of Legal Research 4, no. 3 (August 8, 2022): 655–72. https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27558.
Riyanto, Agus. Agus Riyanto, Hak Dan Kewajiban Pemegang Obligasi Dan Pemegang Saham. Diakses dari https://Business-Law.Binus.Ac.Id/2018/06/29/Hak-Kewajiban-Pemegang-Obligasi-Dan-Pemegang-Saham/, (2023, November 11).
Salim, HS, and Eils Septiana Nurbaini. Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis Dan Diesrtasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo, 2013.
Septiadi, Anggar. Anggar Septiadi, “Tunda Bayar Obligasi, Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food (AISA) Terancam Pailit”. Diakses dari https://Nasional.Kontan.Co.Id/News/Tunda-Bayar-Obligasi-Tiga-Pilar-Sejahtera-Food-Aisa-Terancam-Pailit,(2023, Desember 12).
Shubhan, M. Hadi. Hukum Kepailitan : Prinsip, Norma, Dan Praktek Di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.
Simanjuntak, Kristi W. "Pengambilan Minuta Akta Dan Pemanggilan Notaris Serta Hak Ingkar Notaris Berdasarkan Sumpah Jabatan Notaris Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan." JUSTISI 5.1 (2019): 34-49. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v5i1.538
Syahril, Muh. Akbar Fhad. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Pengguna Kartu Automatic Teller Machine”. JUSTISI 7 (1) 2021 : 52-65. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v7i1.1159.
Tjiptono Darmadji, Hendri M. Fakhruddin. Pasar Modal Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2001.
Warsito, Lilik. “Urgensi Pembuktian Syarat Kepailitan Dan Tes Insolvensi Dalam Permohonan Kepailitan.” Jurnal USM Law Review 7, no. 2 (June 30, 2024): 822. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Happy Permata Sari, Joni Emirzon, Putu Samawati Saleh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
