Conducting Court Proceedings in Contested Divorce Cases for Persons with Disabilities at Class 1a Malang Religious Court

Authors

  • Lia Rosa Fauziah Kilihu Universitas Islam Malang
  • Moh. Muhibbin Universitas Islam Malang
  • Suratman Suratman Universitas Islam Malang
  • Nurika Falah Ilmania Universitas Islam Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i2.3168

Keywords:

People with Disabilities, Judiciary, Religious Court of Malang

Abstract

People with disabilities often receive unequal treatment, especially in the justice process. People with disabilities have equal rights in everything, including the legal process. However, there are barriers for persons with disabilities in the Religious Court of Malang. The purpose of this writing is to find out the obstacles and efforts that occur to persons with disabilities during the legal process.  The research method used is empirical juridical, by conducting interviews or observations at the Malang Class 1A Religious Court.  In this study, it was found that the barriers to lawyering in the Malang Religious Court were insufficient facilities for persons with disabilities, such as the use of language in communication for persons with disabilities. The purpose of legal services for persons with disabilities when dealing with the law in the Religious Courts is to realize inclusive religious justice services. The obstacles in Religious Court of Malang continue to be pursued optimally and gradually by the Malang Religious Court through capacity building for human resources to understand disabilities within the scope of the court which is needed as part of excellent service, which aims to provide information and information to parties with disabilities without hesitation.

References

Adelia, Nabilla Alya, Siti Muflichah, dan Rochati Rochati. “Gugat Cerai Karena Perselisihan Dan Pertengkaran Terus-Menerus (Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Baturaja Nomor 30/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Bta).” Soedirman Law Review 1, no. 1 (2019): 135–44. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.slr.2019.1.1.42.

Ainullah, Ainullah. “Penerapan Teori Kemanfaatan Hukum (Utilitarianisme) Dalam Kebijakan Pembatasan Usia Pernikahan.” Ulumuna: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 3, no. 1 (27 Juni 2017): 86–97. https://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/madura/index.php/ulumuna/article/view/4120.

Ariani, Nevey Varida. “Gugatan Sederhana dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18, no. 3 (21 September 2018): 381–96. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.381-396.

Difabel, Buletin. Memaknai Hari Perempuan Internasional: Penanganan Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan Difabel, Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta: SADPA (Sentra Advokasi Perempuan, Difabel dan Anak., 2010.

Djalil, Basiq. Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2006.

Fauzi, Maghfira Nur Khaliza. “Kompleksitas Pemenuhan Hak Penyandang Disabilitas Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Di Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang.” Inovasi Pembangunan : Jurnal Kelitbangan 10, no. 03 (1 Desember 2022): 221–221. https://doi.org/10.35450/jip.v10i03.317.

Harun, Nurlaila. “Proses Peradilan Dan Arti Sebuah Keyakinan Hakim Dalam Memutus Suatu Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama Manado.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah 15, no. 2 (31 Desember 2017). https://doi.org/10.30984/as.v15i2.479.

Ilmania, Nurika Falah, dan Nofi Sri Utami. “Pemenuhan Hak Kesehatan Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Sosial.” Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang 6, no. 2 (20 Juni 2023): 166–84. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v6i2.19448.

Ndaumanu, Frichy. “Hak Penyandang Disabilitas: Antara Tanggung Jawab dan Pelaksanaan oleh Pemerintah Daerah.” Jurnal HAM 11, no. 1 (28 April 2020): 131–50. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.131-150.

Nugroho, Agus Digdo. Quo Vadis Pencari Keadilan Penyandang Disabilitas di Pengadilan. Surabaya: Cipta Media Nusantara, 2019.

Romado, Muhammad Garda, dan Mitro Subroto. “Upaya Pemenuhan Hak Bagi Narapidana Penyandang Disabilitas.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 5, no. 3 (2021): 6382–86.

Sukarna, Ayuni, dan Sofyan Sofyan. “Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Di Kantor Pengadilan Agama Bulukumba.” Siyasatuna : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar’iyyah 4, no. 2 (28 Mei 2023): 163–73. https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/siyasatuna/article/view/29916.

Suratman, Suratman, dan Phillips Dillah. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Penerbit Alfa Beta, 2015.

Wicaksono, Agustinus Herwindu. “Tindak Pidana Pelanggaran Pidana Lalu Lintas Oleh Anak Dalam Proses Acara Peradilan Cepat.” Badamai Law Journal 4, no. 2 (25 September 2020): 279–96. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v4i2.9237.

Widyakso, Rendra. “Eksekusi Nafkah Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kota Malang.” Ulumuddin Journal of Islamic Legal Studies 11, no. 1 (30 Juni 2018): 116–43. https://doi.org/10.22219/ulumuddin.v11i1.10409.

Downloads

Published

08-03-2024

How to Cite

Kilihu, L. R. F., Muhibbin, M., Suratman, S., & Ilmania, N. F. (2024). Conducting Court Proceedings in Contested Divorce Cases for Persons with Disabilities at Class 1a Malang Religious Court. JUSTISI, 10(2), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i2.3168

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)