Politik Agraria dan Resistensi Lokal: Peran Kelompok Keagamaan dalam Penolakan Proyek Geothermal Padarincang

Authors

  • Agisthia Lestari Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v11i2.5135

Keywords:

Agrarian Politics; Geothermal; Local Resistance

Abstract

This article analyses the dynamics of agrarian politics in the conflict surrounding the development of a geothermal power plant in Padarincang, Serang Regency, Banten. Although the geothermal project is positioned as part of the national Energy Transition and Sustainable Development agenda, local communities reject its presence because they consider it a threat to water sources, ecosystems, and the social and spiritual order of the community. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method, through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation studies. The analysis was conducted using a critical agrarian political framework and an institutional-cultural approach. The results show that the resistance of the Padarincang community is not solely driven by economic or ecological interests, but also by moral and spiritual values. Two religious groups, namely Syarekat Perjuangan Rakyat Padarincang (SAPAR) and Gerakan Perempuan SAPAR (GRAPAS), acted as cultural political actors who articulated their rejection of the geothermal project through religious symbols, ecological ethics, and local wisdom. Religion serves as cultural and symbolic capital, strengthening social solidarity, building alternative public spaces, and providing moral legitimacy to resistance movements. This study emphasises that contemporary agrarian politics in Indonesia cannot be separated from the cultural and spiritual dimensions of local communities, and highlights the importance of a just and participatory approach to energy transition.

References

Abdullah, I. (2018). Konstruksi sosial agama dan politik lokal di Indonesia. Pustaka Pelajar.

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, Article 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Anugrah, I. (2019). Persoalan agraria dan demokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Prisma, 38(3), 3–16.

Bayat, A. (2013). Life as politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.

Borras, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2013). Global land grabbing and political reactions “from below”. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1723–1747. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.843845

Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2011). Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.559005

Dewan Energi Nasional. (2023). Laporan kinerja tahun 2023. Sekretaris Dewan Energi Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Hogemann, Edna Raquel. (2024). The Selectivity of the Public Sphere and Subaltern Public Spheres: Perspectives of Habermas and Nancy Fraser and Their Impact on Human Rights Public Policies. Revista Consinter. 307-325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00019.13

Konsorsium Pembaharuan Agraria. (2025, January). Konflik agraria naik 21%. https://www.kpa.or.id/2025/01/kpa-konflik-agraria-naik-21/

Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria. (2025). Catatan akhir tahun 2024: Adakah reforma agraria di bawah komando Prabowo. https://www.kpa.or.id/publikasi/adakah-reforma-agraria-di-bawah-komando-prabowo/

Kusniati, R. (2024). Free, prior, and informed consent principles as Indigenous peoples’ right: Soft law or hard law? Jambe Law Journal, 7(1), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i1.350

Lestari, A. (2025). Politik agraria: Sejarah, perkembangan, dan konflik. Kreasi Cendekia Pustaka.

Li, T. M. (2020). Land’s end: Capitalist relations on an Indigenous frontier. Duke University Press.

Lilja, M., Baaz, M., Schulz, M., & Vinthagen, S. (2017). How resistance encourages resistance: Theorizing the nexus between power, organised resistance, and everyday resistance. Journal of Political Power, 10(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2017.1286084

Mahmood, S. (2012). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.

Maulana, A. T. (2021). Evaluasi implementasi kebijakan pelayanan terpadu satu pintu (PTSP) dalam upaya meningkatkan kepuasan masyarakat pada Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika. Jurnal Signal, 10(2), 296–308.

Peluso, N. L. (2018). Entangled territories in small-scale gold mining frontiers. World Development, 101, 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.006

Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011). New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.607692

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 79 Tahun 2014 tentang Kebijakan Energi Nasional. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 300.

Rachman, N. F. (2019). Meneliti proses kebijakan land reform di Indonesia. Jurnal Prisma, 38(3), 17–37.

Safitri, H. (2019). Urbanisasi dan industri pertambangan. Jurnal Prisma, 38(3), 85–99.

Smith, J. D., Adam, R., & Maarif, S. (2024). How social movements use religious creativity to address environmental crises in Indonesian local communities. Global Environmental Change, 84, Article 102772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102772

Tanuro, D. (2013). Green capitalism: Why it can’t work. Merlin Press.

Verwiebe, R., & Hagemann, S. (2024). Bourdieu revisited: New forms of digital capital—Emergence, reproduction, inequality of distribution. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2358170

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Lestari, A. (2025). Politik Agraria dan Resistensi Lokal: Peran Kelompok Keagamaan dalam Penolakan Proyek Geothermal Padarincang. Jurnal Noken: Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 11(2), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v11i2.5135

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.