Freelance Platform Sebagai Pengelolah Tuan Tanah: Struktur Tekno-Feodalisme dalam Ekonomi Platform Ilustrator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v11i2.5025Keywords:
Techno-feudalism, Freelance Platform, Illustrator, algorithm, Immaterial WorkAbstract
On platforms such as Fiverr and Upwork, the relationship between workers, clients, and companies is organized into a new structure that resembles feudalism: the platform acts as a digital landlord extracting rent from every interaction, while the algorithm replaces the overseer in regulating the rhythm of production. Through a phenomenological ethnographic approach to illustrators in Indonesia, work experiences are recorded as a constant negotiation between freedom and control. Ratings, reviews, and response speed become indicators that determine visibility while simultaneously shaping the workers’ emotional consciousness. Anxiety, communication strategies, and self-management emerge as responses to the algorithmic power that continuously monitors them. The flexibility often promised by the platform transforms into a new disciplinary mechanism that subdues creativity under the logic of data. Within this digital space, immaterial labor intertwines with techno-feudal power, where creativity, emotion, and lived experience are ensnared within a rent structure no longer grounded in land, but in networks and algorithms.
References
Baitenizov, D. T., Dubina, I. N., Campbell, D. F. J., Carayannis, E. G., & Azatbek, T. A. (2018). Freelance as a creative mode of self-employment in a new economy (a literature review). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0574-5
Braverman, Harry. (1974). Labor and Monopoly Capital The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York : Monthly Review Press.
Fiverr. (2025). Fiverr: Freelance services marketplace. Retrieved November 2, 2025, from https://www.fiverr.com
Fuchs, Christian. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.
Lazzarato, M. (1996) Immaterial Labour. In: Hardt, M. and Virno, P., Eds., Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis and London, 133-147.
Marx, Karl. (1867). Capital Volume 1. Marxist.org.
Pires, Guilherme Nunes. (2021). Uberization of labor and Marx’s Capital. R. Katál., Florianópolis, v. 24, n. 1, p. 228-234, jan./abr. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0259.2021.e74812.
Ram, Kalpana. (2015). Moods and Method : Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty on Emotion and Understanding. In Kalpana Ram & Christopher Houston (Ed.), Phenomenology in Anthropology : A Sense of Perspective. Indiana : Indiana University Press.
Royal, Penny. (2018). Research Paper : Creative Employment in a Gig Economy. https://www.pennyroyal.me/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Creative-Employment-in-a-Gig-Econ my-Research-Paper-P-Royal-20181106.pdf. (diakses pada 21 Oktober 2025, 11:35)
Schein, Rebecca. (2021). From free time to idle time: Time, work-discipline, and the gig economy. In Paul O’Connel & Umut Özsu (Ed.), Research Handbook on Law and Marxism (pp.400-420). Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Srnicek, Nick. (2017). Platform Capitalism. UK: Polity Press.
Upwork. (2025). Upwork: The world’s work marketplace. Retrieved November 2, 2025, from https://www.upwork.com
Varoufakis, Yanis. (2023). Techno-feudalism : What Killed Capitalism. Vintage Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Faizal Akhyani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








