DESKRIPSI KEMAMPUAN BERFIKIR KRITIS UNTUK MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH PECAHAN MELALUI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/jme.v2i2.3373Keywords:
Gaya Kognitif, Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis, Pecahan, Pemecahan MasalahAbstract
This study aims to describe students' critical thinking ability (CTA) in solving mathematical problems on the topic of fractions based on cognitive styles. The research was conducted using a descriptive qualitative method, involving two students from SMPN 2 Takalar as subjects. The instruments used were the GEFT test, a critical thinking ability test, and interview guidelines. The results of the study showed that overall, FI students demonstrated better abilities in analysis, evaluation, and inference compared to FD students. Although both had equal abilities in interpretation, FI students stood out in overall critical thinking ability based on the given indicators. Additionally, FD students were less capable of making conjectures, formulating, and providing reasons for solutions. However, they performed well in manipulating mathematics. Moreover, FD students were unable to draw conclusions and check the validity of arguments. On the other hand, FI students were able to make conjectures, manipulate mathematics, draw conclusions from statements, and check the validity of arguments. Cognitive style is important in critical thinking activities for learning fractions; therefore, students should be given learning opportunities to not remain static in their current cognitive style.
References
Abu Bakar, Z., & Ali, R. (2018). Interchangeable Concept of Cognitive Styles and Learning Styles: a Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i2.6573
Afriani, M., Muslim, & Ghazali1, M. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Seminar Nasional Taman Siswa Bima, 1, 411–422.
Afriansyah, E. A. (2018). DESAIN LINTASAN PEMBELAJARAN PECAHAN MELALUI PENDEKATAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION. In Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 463–474). Institut Pendidikan Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v6i3.334
Aklimawati, A., Listiana, Y., Isfayani, E., Zainuddin, Z., & Aulia, R. (2022). Pengembangan Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) Berbasis Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Pada Materi Geometri. In Jurnal Serunai Matematika (Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 51–63). STKIP Budidaya. https://doi.org/10.37755/jsm.v14i2.665
Anita Dian Pratiwi, Aryo Andri Nugroho, Rina Dwi Setyawati, & Susilo Raharjo. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Pada Siswa Kelas IV Di SD Negeri Tlogosari 01 Semarang. Janacitta, 6(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.35473/jnctt.v6i1.2263
Arigawati, N. H., & Kusnandi, K. (2023). Berpikir Kritis Siswa Ditinjau dari Gender dan Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent dan Field Independent. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(8), 6125–6133. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i8.2408
Bachtiar, M. Y. (2022). Inovasi Pembelajaran Daring dan Dampak Bagi PAUD Selama Pandemi Covid-19. 6(2), 1007–1019. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i2.1411
Elwijaya, F., Harun, M., & Helsa, Y. (2021). Implementassi Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) di Sekolah Dasar. In Jurnal Basicedu (Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 741–748). Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.796
Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1., 1–28. https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF
Faozi, R., Wardono, W., & Haryani, S. (2020). Mathematical Literacy Ability Reviewed From Self-Efficacy In Realistic Mathematics Education Approach. Journal of Primary Education. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/40556
Fridanianti, A., Purwati, H., Hery Murtianto, Y., Kunci, K., Kritis, B., & Kognitif, G. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aljabar Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Pangkah Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Kognitif Impulsif. 9(1), 11–20.
Mulbar, U., & Nasrullah. (2022). Exploration of Students ’ Mathematical Literacy Based on Opportunity to Learn Through Context-Based Questions. ICSAT International Proceeding, 11(4), 476–485.
Nasrullah. (2015). USING CIRCULAR PROBLEM POSING TO ENCOURAGE STUDENTS ’ IN SOLVING PROBLEMS OF MATHEMATICS. Optimalisasi Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Dalam Menunjang Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, 883–892. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/4739/1/141. NASRULLAH FMIPA 2 %28883-892%29.pdf
Nasrullah, Alimuddin, & Talib, A. (2021). Using HTML-Based Worksheet to Support Students in Active Mathematics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1), 012165. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012165
Rosneli, M. R., Fadhilaturrahmi, F., & Hidayat, A. (2020). Penerapan Pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. In Journal on Teacher Education (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 70–78). Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai. https://doi.org/10.31004/jote.v1i1.506
Sari, J., Nasrullah, & Mulbar, U. (2020). Deskripsi Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Program Linear ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Adversitas dan Efikasi Diri. Issues in Mathematics Education (IMED), 4(1), 52–67.
Sumardi, S., & Amalia, I. (2022). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematis dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 2296–2305.
