The Role of Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Task Technology Fit to Increase Perceived Impact on Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/sl.v13i1.3031Keywords:
Task Technology Fit, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Attitude, Perceived Impact on LearningAbstract
This study aims to explore Task-Technology Fit, Perceived Usefulness, and Perceived Ease of Use on users' Attitudes toward Video Conferencing applications, as well as their impact on Perceived Impact on Learning. Researchers added Task-Technology Fit as an element of novelty and used the Technology Acceptance Model as the main theory used. This research uses a survey method with the participation of 170 respondents who actively use Video Conference applications in various contexts and are of all ages with productive age specifications. The results of the analysis show that there is a significant positive correlation between Task-Technology Fit and Perceived Usefulness, as well as Task-Technology Fit and Perceived Ease of Use. In addition, a significant positive relationship was detected between Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness. Furthermore, Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use have a positive impact on users' Attitudes toward Video Conferencing applications. Apparently, user Attitude also has a proven positive influence on the Perceived Impact on Learning. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used as the analysis technique conducted using AMOS Graphics 24. The practical implications of these findings involve recommendations for Video Conferencing application developers to improve features and design to enhance user experience. Hopefully, these findings can support the development of video conferencing-based technologies to be more effective and have a positive impact on virtual learning and interaction.
References
Akram, H., Aslam, S., Saleem, A., & Parveen, K. (2021). The Challenges of Online Teaching in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Public Universities in Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 20, 263–282. https://doi.org/10.28945/4784
Alazab, M., Alhyari, S., Awajan, A., & Abdallah, A. B. (2021). Blockchain technology in supply chain management: an empirical study of the factors affecting user adoption/acceptance. Cluster Computing, 24(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-020-03200-4
Alexiou, A., Schippers, M. C., Oshri, I., & Angelopoulos, S. (2022). Narrative and aesthetics as antecedents of perceived learning in serious games. Information Technology & People, 35(8), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2019-0435
Alizadeh, M., Andersson, K., & Schelén, O. (2022). DHT- and blockchain-based smart identification for video conferencing. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 3(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2022.100066
Al-Maatouk, Q., Othman, M. S., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2020). Task-Technology Fit and Technology Acceptance Model Application to Structure and Evaluate the Adoption of Social Media in Academia. IEEE Access, 8, 78427–78440. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990420
Al-Rahmi, A. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Almutairy, S., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2021). Exploring the Factors Affecting Mobile Learning for Sustainability in Higher Education. Sustainability, 13(14), 7893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147893
Alyoussef, I. Y. (2022). Acceptance of a flipped classroom to improve university students’ learning: An empirical study on the TAM model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Heliyon, 8(12), e12529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12529
Ansari, J. A. N., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00118-7
Arfansyah, H. J., & Marsasi, E. G. (2023). The Effect of Attitude and Trust on Behavioral Intention In The Modern Market Industry. Jurnal Economic Resource, 6(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.57178/jer.v6i1.568
Aufa, A. A., & Marsasi, E. G. (2023). The Influence of Perceived Risk and Loyalty on Purchase Intention of Fashion Products Based on the Theory of Perceived Risk. Jurnal Ekonomi Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 22(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19184/jeam.v22i1.37468
Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3443–3463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7
Chatterjee, S., Nguyen, B., Ghosh, S. K., Bhattacharjee, K. K., & Chaudhuri, S. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence integrated CRM system: an empirical study of Indian organizations. The Bottom Line, 33(4), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-08-2020-0057
Chen, J. (2022). Adoption of M-learning apps: A sequential mediation analysis and the moderating role of personal innovativeness in information technology. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 8, 100237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100237
Chen, Y., Khalid Khan, S., Shiwakoti, N., Stasinopoulos, P., & Aghabayk, K. (2023). Analysis of Australian public acceptance of fully automated vehicles by extending technology acceptance model. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 14, 101072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101072
Cheng, Y.-M. (2020). Understanding cloud ERP continuance intention and individual performance: a TTF-driven perspective. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(4), 1591–1614. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2019-0208
Cheng, Y.-M. (2021). Will robo-advisors continue? Roles of task-technology fit, network externalities, gratifications and flow experience in facilitating continuance intention. Kybernetes, 50(6), 1751–1783. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2020-0185
Debasa, F., Gelashvili, V., Martínez-Navalón, J.-G., & Saura, J. R. (2023). Do stress and anxiety influence users’ intention to make restaurant reservations through mobile apps? European Research on Management and Business Economics, 29(1), 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100205
German Ruiz-Herrera, L., Valencia-Arias, A., Gallegos, A., Benjumea-Arias, M., & Flores-Siapo, E. (2023). Technology acceptance factors of e-commerce among young people: An integration of the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Heliyon, 9(6), e16418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16418
Gil-Cordero, E., Rodriguez-Rad, C., Ledesma-Chaves, P., & Sánchez del Río-Vázquez, M.-E. (2023). Analysis of factors affecting the effectiveness of face-to-face marketing learning via TikTok, YouTube and video conferencing. Heliyon, 9(7), e17195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17195
Herzallah, D., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Liebana-Cabanillas, F. (2022). Drivers of purchase intention in Instagram Commerce. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 26(2), 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2022-0043
Imlawi, J., AL-Shatnawi, A., AlFawwaz, B. M., AL-Shatnawi, H. M., & Al-Masaeed, S. (2023). A Model Predicting Student Engagement And Intention With Mobile Learning Management Systems. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 18, 149–172. https://doi.org/10.28945/5099
Islam, M. N. (2023). Factors affecting adoption of self-service E-ticketing technology: A study on heritage sites in Bangladesh. Heliyon, 9(3), e14691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14691
Jain, G., Singh, H., Chaturvedi, K. R., & Rakesh, S. (2020). Blockchain in logistics industry: in fizz customer trust or not. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(3), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-06-2018-0142
Lin, C.-L., Jin, Y. Q., Zhao, Q., Yu, S.-W., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). Factors Influence Students’ Switching Behavior to Online Learning under COVID-19 Pandemic: A Push–Pull–Mooring Model Perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00570-0
Marsasi, E. G., & Barqiah, S. (2023). They The Role of Gender, Age, And Educational Groups in Utilitarian Motivation for Sharia Products. Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17358/ijbe.9.1.104
Masukujjaman, M., Alam, S. S., Siwar, C., & Halim, S. A. (2021). Purchase intention of renewable energy technology in rural areas in Bangladesh: Empirical evidence. Renewable Energy, 170, 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.125
Matubatuba, R., & De Meyer-Heydenrych, C. F. (2022). Developing an intention to use amongst non-users of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System: An emerging market perspective. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 45, 100858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100858
Mutambara, D., & Bayaga, A. (2021). Determinants of mobile learning acceptance for STEM education in rural areas. Computers & Education, 160, 104010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104010
Pedram, S., Palmisano, S., Skarbez, R., Perez, P., & Farrelly, M. (2020). Investigating the process of mine rescuers’ safety training with immersive virtual reality: A structural equation modelling approach. Computers & Education, 153, 103891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103891
Qashou, A. (2021). Influencing factors in M-learning adoption in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1755–1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10323-z
Qu, S., Zhou, M., Kong, N., & Campy, K. S. (2023). Factors influencing user acceptance of weight management apps among Chinese obese individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Policy and Technology, 12(2), 100758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100758
Rahi, S., Khan, M. M., & Alghizzawi, M. (2020). Extension of technology continuance theory (TCT) with task technology fit (TTF) in the context of Internet banking user continuance intention. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 38(4), 986–1004. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2020-0074
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022). Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562
Savaş, B. Ç., & Turan, M. (2023). Exploring Perceived Learning Among Students of Sports Sciences in Distance Education. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 98(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2023-0002
Shao, M., Hong, J.-C., & Zhao, L. (2022). Impact of the self-directed learning approach and attitude on online learning ineffectiveness: The mediating roles of internet cognitive fatigue and flow state. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.927454
Tisza, G., & Markopoulos, P. (2021). Understanding the role of fun in learning to code. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 28, 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100270
Vanduhe, V. Z., Nat, M., & Hasan, H. F. (2020). Continuance Intentions to Use Gamification for Training in Higher Education: Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Social Motivation, and Task Technology Fit (TTF). IEEE Access, 8, 21473–21484. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966179
Verlicchi, P., Lacasa, E., & Grillini, V. (2023). Quantitative and qualitative approaches for CEC prioritization when reusing reclaimed water for irrigation needs – A critical review. Science of The Total Environmen. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165735
Wang, C., Ahmad, S. F., Bani Ahmad Ayassrah, A. Y. A., Awwad, E. M., Irshad, M., Ali, Y. A., Al-Razgan, M., Khan, Y., & Han, H. (2023). An empirical evaluation of technology acceptance model for Artificial Intelligence in E-commerce. Heliyon, 9(8), e18349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18349
Wang, H., Tao, D., Yu, N., & Qu, X. (2020). Understanding consumer acceptance of healthcare wearable devices: An integrated model of UTAUT and TTF. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 139, 104156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104156
Yakubu, M. N., Dasuki, S. I., Abubakar, A. M., & Kah, M. M. O. (2020). Determinants of learning management systems adoption in Nigeria: A hybrid SEM and artificial neural network approach. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3515–3539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10110-w
Yao, Y., Wang, P., Jiang, Y., Li, Q., & Li, Y. (2022). Innovative online learning strategies for the successful construction of student self-awareness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Merging TAM with TPB. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100252
Yao-Ping Peng, M., Xu, Y., & Xu, C. (2023). Enhancing students’ English language learning via M-learning: Integrating technology acceptance model and S-O-R model. Heliyon, 9(2), e13302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13302
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 SENTRALISASI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in Sentralisasi. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
Sentralisasi's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Sentralisasi permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Sentralisasi on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article (please read our deposit policy),
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Sentralisasi).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Sentralisasi will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Sentralisasi will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Sentralisasi entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Sentralisasi will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article editorial process is successfully completed. Sentralisasi's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.