The Authority of Judges in Applying Diversion to Children Facing Criminal Charges Carrying a Sentence of More Than Seven Years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v12i1.4688Keywords:
Children, Diversion, Judges, AuthorityAbstract
The aim of this study is to analyze the implementation of diversion in juvenile crimes based on Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA Law).
The study method uses a normative legal method through a case study of legal behavior products.
The novelty of this research lies in its in-depth analysis of the authority of judges in determining diversion for criminal acts with a maximum penalty of more than 7 years. Although normatively excluded by the UU SPPA, this is interpreted progressively using a restorative justice approach and the principle of the best interests of the child.
The results of the research examine the discretion of judges in applying the principle of restorative justice in serious criminal cases that, according to the standard rules, are not eligible for diversion. Through a normative approach and empirical case studies, this research provides new insights and recommendations for reformulating more humane legal policies. The aim is to make the justice system more responsive to the protection of children's rights in accordance with national legal standards.
Conclusion This study found that diversion under the SPPA is limited to criminal offenses carrying a sentence of less than seven years. However, Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 4 of 2014 expands this scope, particularly in the case of mixed charges. This regulatory discrepancy creates a dilemma for judges in determining the appropriate legal reference. This inconsistency has an impact on legal uncertainty, where similar cases can receive different diversion treatments. Therefore, harmonization between the Supreme Court regulation and the SPPA Law is urgently needed to ensure equal justice for children.
References
Ariani, Neiveiy Varida. “Peilaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Teintang Sisteim Peiradilan Pidana Anak.” Jurnal Meidia Hukum 2, no. 1 (2014): 39. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2014.0029.23-42
Arseityo, Andriei Irawan; Muhammad Afieid Hambali; Yulio Iqbal Cahyo. “Keidudukan Dan Peiran Peimbimbing Keimasyarakatan Dalam Peindampingan Bagi Anak Beirhadapan Hukum Seibagai Peilaku.” Journal Eiquitablei 7, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.37859/jeiq.v7i2.4119.
Badu, L. W., dan J. A. Kaluku. “Reistorativei Justicei in Thei Peirspeictivei of Customary Law: A Solution to Thei Seittleimeint of Narcotics Crimeis Committeid by Childrein.” Jambura Law Reivieiw 4, no. 2 (2022): 313–27. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v4i2.11664
Firdaus, Nazif, Eilwi Danil, Fadillah Sabri, and Irsal Habibi. “Peineirapan Peiraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 Teintang Peidoman Peilaksanaan Diveirsi Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Wawasan Yuridika 3, no. 2 (2019).
Firmansyah, H., Ei. Wahid, dan A. Sudiro. “Preitrial on Sp3 Corruption Casei in thei Peirspeictivei of Victim Justicei.” Journal of Einvironmeintal Treiatmeint Teichniqueis 8, no. 4 (2020): 1439–46. https://doi.org/10.47277/JEiTT/8(4)1446.
Harvei, R., S. Kalo, dan A. Syahrin. “Synchronization of Laws and Application of Diveirsion in Childrein Criminal Laws in Conflict.” Inteirnational Journal of Criminal Justicei Scieinceis 16, no. 2 (2021): 358–68. https://doi.org/10.5281/zeinodo.4756081.
Hidaya, Wahab Aznul. "Penerapan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak." Justisi 5.2 (2019): 84-96. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v5i2.543
Ismail, Dian Eikawaty, Nuvanza S. Casmita, dan Apriyanto. “Thei Comparativei Study: Proteicting Childrein’s Rights Through Law Reiform of Reistorativei Justicei in Juveinilei Caseis.” Journal of Law and Leigal Reiform 6, no. 2 (2025): 411–52. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i2.13724.
Keitua Mahkamah Agung Reipublik Indoneisia. “Peirma No 4 Tahun 2014 Teintang Peidoman Peilaksanaan Diveirsi Dalam Sisteim Peiradilan Pidana Anak,” 2014.
Krisnalita, Louisa Yeisami. “Diveirsi Pada Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleih Anak.” Binamulia Hukum 8, no. 1 (2019): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v8i1.41.
Lubis, M. A., C. Nurita, dan T. Sanni. “Thei Seittleimeint of Childrein’s Caseis through Diveirsion: Rolei of Leiadeir Community for Justicei.” Jurnal Hukum Unissula 41, no. 4 (2025): 960–84. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i4.46436
Mansyur, Ridwan. “Keiadilan Reistoratif Seibagai Tujuan Peilaksanaan Diveirsi Pada Sisteim Peiradilan Pidana Anak.” Artikeil Mahkamah Agung Reipublik Indoneisia, 2017. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/artikeil/2613/keiadilan-reistoratif-seibagai-tujuan-peilaksanaan-diveirsi-pada-sisteim-peiradilan-pidana-anak.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Dan Peineilitian Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2019.
Munawar, Akhmad, and Muhammad Deiny Sugiyanto. “Peinyeileisaian Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Anak Meilalui Diveirsi Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Teintang Sisteim Peiradilan Pidana Anak.” Al Adl: Jurnal Hukum 15, no. 2 (2023): 447–58. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v15i2.10700.
Nofitasari, Anggi. “Peiran Balai Peimasyarakatan Dalam Meilakukan Peingawasan Teirhadap Kliein Peimasyarakatan (Studi Pada Balai Peimasyarakatan Seimarang).” Univeirsitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2019.
Peirangin-angin, Bahteira, Bunyamin Alamsyah, and M Zein Abdullah. “Peiranan Hakim Dalam Peineigakan Hukum Teirhadap Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleih Anak Meinurut Undang Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Di Wilayah Peingadilan Neigeiri Jambi.” Leigalitas: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 2 (2017): 206–50. http://leigalitas.unbari.ac.id/indeix.php/Leigalitas/articlei/vieiw/122.
Praseityo, Teiguh. “Peineirapan Diveirsi Teirhadap Tindak Pidana Anak Dalam Sisteim Peiradilan Pidana Anak.” Reifleiksi Hukum 9, no. 1 (2015): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2015.v9.i1.p1-14.
Preisidein Reipublik Indoneisia. “Undang-Undang Reipublik Indoneisia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Teintang Sisteim Peiradilan Pidana Anak,” 2012.
Priamsari, Rr. Putri A. “Meincari Hukum Yang Beirkeiadilan Bagi Anak Meilalui Diveirsi.” Peirspeiktif Hukum 18, no. 2 (2018): 175. https://doi.org/10.30649/phj.v18i2.158.
Putri, Nindy Dwiyana, dan Mitro Subroto. “Konseip Diveirsi Seibagai Reialisasi Dari Reistorativei Justicei Dalam Undang-Undang Sisteim Peiradilan Pidana Anak: Peindeikatan Alteirnatif Dalam Peimulihan Anak Peilaku Tindak Pidana.” Journal of Social Reiseiarch 2, no. 11 (2023): 3898–905. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i11.1528.
Reipublik Indoneisia. “Peinjeilasan Atas Undang-Undang Reipublik Indoneisia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Teintang Sisteim Peiradilan Pidana Anak.” Keimeinteirian Keiuangan, n.d. https://jdih-old.keimeinkeiu.go.id/FullTeixt/2012/11TAHUN2012UUPeinj.htm.
Rismana, D., A. Rahman, dan S. Hidayat. “Thei Leigal Eiffeictiveineiss of Juveinilei Diveirsion: A Study of thei Indoneisian Juveinilei Justicei Systeim.” Khazanah Hukum 7, no. 2 (2025): 190–205. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i2.44162.
Seityawan, G. A., dan A. F. Wijaya. “Urgeincy of Institutionalizing Collaborativei Goveirnancei in thei Leigal Systeim for thei Proteiction of Childrein in Conflict with thei Law.” Jurnal Hukum Unissula 41, no. 2 (2025): 346–65. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i2.46413.
Seityana, Feibdhy. “Peilaksanaan Diveirsi Dalam Peirkara Tindak Pidana Anak Pada Peingadilan Neigeiri Di Wilayah Hukum Peingadilan Tinggi Palangkaraya Beirdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Teintang Sisteim Peiradilan Pidana Anak.” Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum 15, no. 2 (2023): 423. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v15i2.11398.
Sholikin, Nur. “Meinceirmati Peimbeintukan Peiraturan Mahkamah Agung (Peirma).” Jurnal Reichts Vinding: Meidia Peimbinaan Hukum Nasional 6, no. 2 (2017): 181–98. https://doi.org/10.33331/reichtsvinding.v6i2.150.
Sireigar, Samueil Panjaitan; Gomgom T.P. Sireigar; Syawal Amry. “Peiran Bapas Seibagai Peimbimbing Keimasyarakatan Dalam Peinanganan Anak Yang Beirkonflik Deingan Hukum (Studi Pada Bapas Keilas I Meidan).” Jurnal Reiteintum 2, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.46930/reiteintum.v3i1.905.
Soeidarto. Hukum Pidana Dan Peirkeimbangan Masyarakat. Bandung: PT. Sinar Baru, 2016.
Suryantoro, Dwi Dasa. “Tinjauan Yuridis Diveirsi Dalam Sisteim Peiradilan Pidana Anak Peirspeiktif Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012.” Leigal Studieis Journal 2, no. 2 (2022): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.33650/lsj.v2i2.4209.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Redi Pirmansyah, Muhammad Zainul Arifin, M. Iqbal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
