Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One Perpetrator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i1.3849Keywords:
Fines, TBTS Tax Invoice, Justice, Legal Certainty, BenefitAbstract
Criminal fines in the case of issuance of tax invoices that are not based on actual transactions (TBTS) aim to recover losses of state revenue, but in the event that there is more than one perpetrator, the fines applied cannot be applied equally to each perpetrator because the fines applied become multiple. This writing is prepared to analyze the application of criminal fines for the issuance of TBTS tax invoices involving more than one perpetrator in the perspective of legal objectives. The research method used is normative legal research with a case study approach and a conceptual approach using the reference of Development Law Theory. This research is a new contribution to legal development in the application of criminal fines in the criminal offense of issuing TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator. This writing concludes that the application of criminal fines in the case of issuance of TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator is carried out proportionally and objectively according to the benefits or benefits obtained by each perpetrator in order to fulfill the principles of legal certainty, justice and expediency. The absence of rules regarding the mechanism for the application of criminal fines for the issuance of TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator is an obstacle to efforts to apply criminal fines as a recovery for losses of state revenue.
References
Budiman, Syarioto, Budiman Ginting, Utary Maharani, and Anggreni Atmei Lubis. “Analisis Hukum Perpajakan Terhadap Investasi Properti Terkait Dengan Penerimaan Pajak Di Kota Medan.” ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v2i1.99.
Burhan, Andi Ulil Amri, and Gunadi Gunadi. “Optimalisasi Wewenang PPNS DJP Dalam Penyitaan Dan Pemblokiran Aset Untuk Pemulihan Kerugian Pendapatan Negara.” Owner 6, no. 4 (2022): 4199–4209. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i4.1102.
Citra Utami, Ratu Dini, and Rahman Abd Saleh. “Kajian Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Pajak Terhadap Pembuat Dan Pengguna Faktur Pajak Tidak Berdasarkan Transaksi Sebenarnya (TBTS).” Journal Of Social Science Research 4, no. 1 (2024): 2863–74.
Dan, Pemungutan Pajak. “Pemungutan Pajak Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 7, no. 1 (2014): 142–57. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v7i1.128.
Fitrah, Farrel Alanda, Agus Takariawan, and Zainal Muttaqin. “Kedudukan Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Dalam Kerangka Penegakan Hukum Pidana Perpajakan Di Indonesia.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (2021): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i1.107.
Hidaya, Hasriyanti. Wahab Aznul. “Forensic Accounting Strategies in Detecting and Investigating Corruption Crime.” JUSTISI 7, no. 1 (2019): 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v5i1.537.
Hidaya, Wahab Aznul. “Penerapan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Justisi 5, no. 2 (2019): 84–96. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v5i2.543.
Kharisma, Z A, B B W Putra, and ... “Model Pertanggungjawaban Atas Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh BUMN Sebagai Korporasi: Antara Tanggungjawab Korporasi Dan Pengurus.” Jurnal Hukum Lex … 2, no. 12 (2021): 1319–43. https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/162%0Ahttps://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/download/162/74.
Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. Konsep-Konsep Hukum Dalam Pembangunan. Bandung: Alumni, 2002.
Muharuddin, Muharuddin, Wahab Aznul Hidaya, and Jamaluddin Rumatiga. “Tanggungjawab Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Kerusakan Terumbu Karang Di Kabupaten Raja Ampat.” JUSTISI 6, no. 2 (2020): 64–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v6i2.949.
Prabowo Setyo Aji, and Hartawiningsih. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perpajakan (Analisa Putusan Nomor: 334/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Brt Atas Nama PT Gemilang Sukses Garmindo).” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 4, no. 3 (2024): 227–40. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i3.1896.
Putra, I Made Walesa, Marcus Priyo Gunarto, and Dahliana Hasan. “Penentuan Kesalahan Korporasi Pada Tindak Pidana Perpajakan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat No.: 334/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Brt).” Media Iuris 5, no. 2 (2022): 231–58. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v5i2.33369.
Rakia, A. Sakti R.S., and Wahab Aznul Hidaya. “Aspek Feminist Legal Theory Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Amsir Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2022): 69–88. https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v4i1.104.
Sa’adah, Nabitatus, and Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa. “Batasan Kewenangan Mengadili Sengketa Pajak Antara Pengadilan Pajak Dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 52, no. 1 (2023): 21–29. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.52.1.2023.21-29.
Sinaga, Niru Anita. “Reformasi Pajak Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Pendapatan Negara.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 8, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v8i1.136.
Siregar, Rischad Widianto, Niru Anita Sinaga, and Selamat Lumban Gaol. “Legal Study on the Criminal Offence of Falsification of Tax Invoice Who Has Obtained Tax Amnesty Kajian Hukum Atas Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Faktur Pajak Yang Telah Memperoleh Pengampunan Pajak.” JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN 10, no. 2 (2024): 567–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v10i2.5978.
Soleh, Mohammad Faisol. “Penimbunan Alat Pelindung Diri Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Kajian Hukum Pidana Bidang Perlindungan Konsumen.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (2020): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.1-31.
Thontowi, Jawahir. “Pengaturan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dan Implementasi Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tradisionalnya.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 10, no. 1 (2015): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v10i1.4190.
Wijayanta, Tata. “Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 14, no. 2 (2014): 216–26. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.2.291.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anggiat Sautma, Sigid Suseno, Amelia Cahyadini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
