Constructing the Concept of Commissioner Judge in Enforcing the Exclusionary Rules Principle in Indonesia

Authors

  • Febryan Alam Susatyo Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i3.2607

Keywords:

Commissioner Judge, Due process of law, Exclusionary rules, Pretrial

Abstract

Pretrial aims to protect human rights from misuse of authority by law enforcement officials. The concept of commissioner judges, which aims to be a substitute for the current pretrial procedure. It is expected to achieve the objectives of criminal procedural law that respects human rights by upholding the exclusionary rules principle. This study aims to understand the role of the commissioner judge in upholding the principle of exclusionary rules to achieve a criminal legal process that respects human rights. Further, a normative approach used statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. The author tries to discover the concept of a commissioner judge upholding the exclusionary rules principle to assess the validity of evidence obtained by law enforcement officials. It is hoped that the objectives of criminal procedure law that protect and guarantee the interests of human rights can be achieved by the concept of commissioner judge.

References

Amin Siregar, Rahmat Efendy Al. “Due Process of Law Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia Kaitannya Dengan Perlindungan Ham.” FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 1, no. 1 (2016): 35. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v1i1.326.

Fernando, Z J. “DUE PROCESS OF LAW DALAM PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA DI INDONESIA.” Journals.Unihaz.Ac.Id, n.d.

Hamzah, Andi, and RM EQ SURACHMAN. PRE-TRIAL JUSTICE & DISCRETIONARY JUSTICE Dalam KUHAP Berbagai Negara. Edited by Tarmizi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Teori & Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Hikmawat, Puteri. “EKSISTENSI HAKIM KOMISARIS DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (Analisis Terhadap RUU Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana),” 2013.

“Https://Kontras.Org/2014/01/12/Polri-Hentikan-Rekayasa-Kasus/,” n.d.

“Https://Tirto.Id/Data-Kontras-Polisi-Diduga-Rekayasa-27-Kasus-Sepanjang-2019-2022-GvSF,” n.d.

Ilyas, Adam. “Praktik Penerapan Exclusionary Rules Di Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 50, no. 1 (2021): 49–59. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.50.1.2021.49-59.

Kartadinata, A. “PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PRAPERADILAN.” Viva Themis: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2023.

Kripsiaji, D, and N B Minarno. “Perluasan Kewenangan Dan Penegakan Hukum Praperadilan Di Indonesia Dan Belanda.” Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum. core.ac.uk, n.d.

Latifah, M. “Perlukah Mengatur Prinsip Exclusionary Rules of Evidence Dalam RUU Hukum Acara Pidana?(Should We Regulate Exclusionary Rule Principle in the Criminal ….” … Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan …, 2021, 101–22. https://dprexternal3.dpr.go.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/2123.

Malarangeng, Andi Bau. “Solusi Praperadilan Oleh Hakim Komisaris Berdasarkan RUU KUHAP.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 7, no. 1 (2012).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. 2017th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Muabezi, Zahermann Armandz. “Negara Berdasarkan Hukum (Rechtsstaats) Bukan Kekuasaan (Machtsstaat).” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 6, no. 3 (2017): 421. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.421-446.

“Naskah Akademik RUU Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana,” 2010.

Pengantar, Kata, Kepala Badan, and Pembinaan Hukum. “Reglement Op de Strafvoerdering,” 2005.

Purwanto, E H. “POTENSI GUGATAN PRA PERADILAN SEBAGAI UPAYA MENGHALANGI PROSES PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” Legal Spirit, 2021.

Rahman, K. “Problem Pengaturan Upaya Paksa Penangkapan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 2020.

“Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.” Negara Hukum 5 No 1 (2014): 31–46.

Rumega, I Wayan Gede. “Hakim Komisaris Dan Miscarriage of Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 1 (2019): 53. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.53-68.

Sahri Sebayang. “Praperadilan Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka Dalam Pemeriksaan Di Tingkat Penyidikan (Studi Pengadilan Negeri Medan).” Jurnal Hukum KAIDAH 18, no. 1 (2015): 83–101.

Siagian, P R, S Kalo, E Yunara, and ... “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Larangan Pengajuan Praperadilan Oleh Orang Yang Berstatus Daftar Pencarian Orang (DPO).” Iuris Studia: Jurnal …, 2021.

Surachman, E R M. Eksistensi Kejaksaan: Dalam Konstitusi Di Berbagai Negara (Edisi Kedua). books.google.com, 2022.

Waruru, Riki Perdana Raya. “Praperadilan Pasca 4 Putusan Mk.” Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2015. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/images/artikel/Praperadilan Pasca 4 Putusan MK.pdf, diakses pada 15 Maret 2022.

Yuhaini, Raja, Auliya Ramadhina, Dewi Haryanti, Ayu Efritadewi, Universitas Maritim, and Raja Ali. “Exclusionary Rules Dalam Tahap Pembuktian Di Pengadilan Guna Memperoleh Alat Bukti Yang Sah.” Pusat Jurnal Ilmiah UMRAH, no. 3 (2022): 838–47.

Downloads

Published

01-06-2024

How to Cite

Febryan Alam Susatyo, & Muksin, M. R. S. (2024). Constructing the Concept of Commissioner Judge in Enforcing the Exclusionary Rules Principle in Indonesia. JUSTISI, 10(3), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i3.2607