Analisis Beban Kerja Mental Pada Karyawan Air Minum Dalam Kemasan “Ajibpol” Menggunakan Metode NASA-TLX

Zia Dwi Arta; Dony Satriyo; Janu Apriyadi

doi:10.33506/mt.v11i2.4531

Authors

Zia Dwi Arta Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
Dony Satriyo Teknik Industri Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
Janu Apriyadi Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33506/mt.v11i2.4531

Keywords:

Bottle Water, Mental Workload, NASA TLX Method, Employee Fatigue

Abstract

Bottled water in Indonesia continues to grow along with the increasing demand for clean and practical water. Company performance is crucial to maintaining competitiveness, one way of doing this is through optimal workload management. Workload, both physical and mental, is directly related to employee fatigue levels. In measuring mental workload, subjective methods such as NASA-TLX are widely used because they are more economical and representative. The NASA-TLX method measures six dimensions: mental demand, physical demand, time demand, performance, effort level, and frustration level. In the Bottled water studied, problems were found such as frequently not achieving production targets, product labeling errors that are still done manually, bottle damage due to worker negligence when taking from the warehouse to the production area, and there are sudden changes in work systems due to employees suddenly requesting leave and being replaced, these factors causing high workloads. The measurement results showed that the highest mental workload was found in administrative staff, quality control, and operational staff, with average scores of 82, 83, and 85, respectively. Simulations of adding workers showed a significant decrease in mental workload, from the high category to medium or low. This study proves that increasing the workforce can be an effective solution to reduce mental workload and improve employee performance in the AMDK sector.

References

Dewi, D. C., Industri, J., Teknologi, S. T., Jambi, N., & Penulis, K. (2020). Analisis Beban Kerja Mental Operator Mesin Menggunakan Metode NASA TLX di PTJL.

Febiyani, A., Febriani, A., & Ma’sum, J. (2021). Calculation of mental load from e-learning student with NASA TLX and SOFI method. Jurnal Sistem Dan Manajemen Industri, 5(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v5i1.2789

Febriansyah, R., Novalia Harahap, U., & Walady, D. (2024). Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP Dan Fuzzy TOPSIS Pada Pt. XYZ Analysis of Employee Performance Appraisals Using the AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods at PT. XYZ Informasi Artikel. https://doi.org/10.32502/js.v9i1

Fristy, A. M. (2022). Pengaruh Beban Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. JNE Pekanbaru. Sains Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(2), 91–97. https://sak.akademimanajemen.or.id/

Geovania Azwar, A., Candra, C., Prodi, ), Industri, T., Sangga, U., & Ypkp, B. (2019). ANALISIS BEBAN KERJA DAN KELELAHAN PADA MAHASISWA MENGGUNAKAN NASA-TLX DAN SOFI STUDI KASUS DI UNIVERSITAS SANGGA BUANA YPKP BANDUNG. 1(1).

Hendrawan, B., Ansori, M., & Hidayat, R. (2013). Pengukuran dan Analisis Beban Kerja Pegawai Bandara Hang Nadim. 1(1), 55–67.

Hidayat, Tf., & Pujangkoro, S. (2013). PENGUKURAN BEBAN KERJA PERAWAT MENGGUNAKAN METODE NASA-TLX DI RUMAH SAKIT XYZ. In Jurnal Teknik Industri FT USU (Vol. 2, Issue 1).

Hutabarat, J. (2018). KOGNITIF ERGONOMI OLEH : JULIANUS HUTABARAT MALANG 2018.

Kai, D. P., & Ii Bandung, D. (2013). Tingkat Beban Kerja Mental Masinis Berdasarkan NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) MIRANTI SITI ASTUTY, CAECILLIA. Jurnal Online Institut Teknologi Nasional Juli, 1.

Putra, S., Handoko, F., & Haryanto, S. (2020). ANALISIS BEBAN KERJA MENGGUNAKAN METODE WORKLOAD ANALYSIS DALAM PENENTUAN JUMLAH TENAGA KERJA YANG OPTIMAL DI CV. JAYA PERKASA TEKNIK, KOTA PASURUAN. Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Industri, 3(2).

Putri, U. L., & Handayani, N. U. (2017). ANALISIS BEBAN KERJA MENTAL DENGAN METODE NASA TLX PADA DEPARTEMEN LOGISTIK PT ABC.

Rahman, F. N., & Pratama, A. Y. (2022). Analisis Beban Kerja Mental Pekerja Train Distribution PT. Solusi Bangun Indonesia. In Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan / JTMIT (Vol. 1).

Ramadhan, R., Tama, I. P., & Yanuar, R. (2014). ANALISA BEBAN KERJA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN WORK SAMPLING DAN NASA-TLX UNTUK MENENTUKAN JUMLAH OPERATOR (Studi Kasus: PT XYZ) ANALYSIS OF WORKLOAD WITH WORK SAMPLING AND NASA-TLX TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF OPERATORS (Case study: PT XYZ).

Refangga, M. A., Musmedi, P., Bambang, E., & Manajemen, G. (2018). Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas Produk Air Minum Dalam Kemasan dengan Menggunakan Statistical Process Control (SPC) dan Kaizen Pada PT. Tujuh Impian Bersama Kabupaten Jember (The Analysis of Quality Control In Bottled Water Using Statistical Process Control (SPC) and Kaizen In PT. Tujuh Impian Bersama Districts Jember).

Rian Histiarini, A., & Arya Bagas Pangestu, D. (2022). ANALISA BEBAN KERJA MENTAL MENGGUNAKAN METODE NASA-TLX PADA BAGIAN OPERATOR. In Metode Jurnal Teknik Industri (Vol. 8, Issue 1).

Roma, B., & Sarvia, E. (2024). Evaluasi Kinerja Kelompok Kerja Pengemasan AMDK Dus Menggunakan Metode Overall Labor Effectiveness (OLE) dan Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Evaluation of the Performance of the AMDK Dus Packaging Work Group Using the Overall Labor Effectiveness (OLE) and Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Methods. Integrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 09(02), 99. https://doi.org/10.32502/i

Setiawati, N. L. P. L. S., Victorious Immanuel, V., Adi Pradnyana Putra, K., & Made Yudi Mertha Antara, I. (2024). Analysis of the Relationship Between Mental Workload and Work Fatigue among Employees in Software Development Companies. https://doi.org/10.32502/int

Sulistiyo, W., & Vitasari, P. (2024). Analisa Beban Kerja Mental Operator Dengan Metode NASA TLX Di PT XYZ. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, 13(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.26593/jrsi.v13i2.7087.45-52

Tarwaka, HABakri, S., & Sudiajeng, L. (2004). Perpustakaan Nasional: Katalog dalam terbitan (KDT) Tarwaka (Vol. 323).

Wiebe, E. N., Roberts, E., & Behrend, T. S. (2010). An examination of two mental workload measurement approaches to understanding multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2009.12.006