Legal Vacuum in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Its Implications for Law Enforcement Disparity in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v12i2.5492Keywords:
Deferral of Prosecution, Criminal Procedure Law, Legal VacuumAbstract
This study aims to analyze various normative and procedural weaknesses within the framework of Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) in Indonesia, particularly regarding the lack of established sentencing guidelines and proportionality parameters, the lack of clarity regarding methods for calculating state financial losses, limited transparency, and inadequate procedural safeguards.
This study employs a normative legal research methodology with a qualitative approach, utilizing a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. The study focuses on relevant legislation, doctrinal constructs, and institutional designs related to the regulation of DPA in Indonesia. Additionally, this research compares regulatory frameworks in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore to identify governance models and procedural safeguards that can be applied in negotiation-based corporate law enforcement.
The novelty of this research lies in the analysis of DPAs, which is not only situated within the context of prosecutorial discretion but also in relation to the corporate insolvency regime, including bankruptcy and debt repayment deferral (PKPU).
The results of the research indicate that DPA regulations in Indonesia have not yet been established through an adequate framework. These issues are evident in the absence of sentencing benchmarks and proportionality, the lack of uniformity in methods for assessing state losses, low transparency, and the fragility of procedural accountability. This situation creates room for unfocused prosecutorial discretion, inconsistent application of the law, and potential disparities in the outcomes of negotiated justice.
The conclusion of this study is that the implementation of DPAs in Indonesia requires an integrated governance framework, emphasizing structured discretion, clear measures of proportionality, judicial oversight, transparency, and interagency coordination. Strengthening these aspects is necessary to ensure legal certainty, maintain public trust, and uphold the legitimacy of negotiated justice in the enforcement of corporate criminal law.
References
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kajian Perbandingan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Arlen, Jennifer, and Marcel Kahan. “Corporate Governance Regulation through Non-Prosecution.” University of Chicago Law Review 84, no. 1 (2017). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol84/iss1/15
Barkow, Rachel. “Prosecutorial Administration: Prosecutor Bias and the Department of Justice.” Virginia Law Review 99, no. 2 (2013). https://www.virginialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/271.pdf
Bibas, Stephanos. “Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of Trial.” Harvard Law Review 117, no. 8 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.464880
Diamantis, Mihailis. “Clockwork Corporations.” Iowa Law Review 103, no. 2 (2018). https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-103-issue-2/clockwork-corporations-a-character-theory-of-corporate-punishment
Doing, Muhammad, Darma Kartian, and Muhammad Irsyadul Ibad. “Strengthening the Constitutional Law System: Legal Challenges and Strategies in Handling the Social, Economic and Political Crisis in Indonesia.” Journal Equity of Law and Governance 5, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.22225/elg.5.1.10260.113-122
Finch, Vanessa, and David Milman. “Insolvency Law and Corporate Governance.” Journal of Corporate Law Studies 22, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139626811
Ford, Cristie. “Corporate Compliance and Regulatory Governance.” Law & Contemporary Problems 83, no. 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2008.00050.x
Fox-Decent, Evan, and Evan J. Criddle. “Interest-Balancing vs. Fiduciary Duty: Two Models for National Security Law.” German Law Journal 13, no. 5 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200020642
Garrett, Brandon L. Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qdskg
Garrett, Brandon L. “Judicial Review in Corporate Settlements.” Columbia Law Review 122, no. 6 (2022). https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/3839
Homer, E. M., and M. O. Maume. “The Deterrent Effect of Federal Corporate Prosecution Agreements: An Exploratory Analysis.” Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime 5, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/2631309X221120003
Huq, Aziz Z. “Racial Equity in Algorithmic Criminal Justice.” Duke Law Journal 68, no. 6 (2019). https://www.jstor.org/stable/48563105
Ibrahim, Metty Murni Wati, Jovita Irawati, Jamin Ginting, and Nelson Pardamean Purba. “Implementation of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Concept in Handling Corporate Crime in the Laws of Indonesia and Other Countries.” Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan 3, no. 5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v3i6.252
Li, Pan, Yun Zhong, and Han Yan. “The Constructive Interaction between Executive and Judicial Powers: Government-Court Coordination and Corporate Investment Efficiency.” Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2026.100539
Martinez, Veronica Root. “Modern-Day Monitorships.” Fordham Law Review 84, no. 5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2581700
Meitasari, Intan, Suratno Suratno, and Yuniwati Yuniwati. “Normative Approach to Law and Economics in Developing Countries: Challenges in Establishing Efficient and Just Market Regulations.” Journal of Law and Economics 4, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.56347/jle.v4i2.373
Mevorach, Irit. “The Future of Corporate Insolvency.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 70, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198782896.001.0001
Mota Prado, Mariana. “Redundancy as a Legal Strategy to Combat Corruption: Exploring the Potential of Institutional Multiplicity to Create Fail-Safe Systems.” Current Legal Problems 77, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuae010
Prabowo, Sidik, Maman Abdurohman, Hilal Hudan Nuha, and Sarwono Sutikno. “Identifying and Validating Critical Factors in Designing a Comprehensive Data Protection Impact Assessment Framework for Indonesia.” International Journal of Safety & Security Engineering 15, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.150113
Prado, Mariana Mota, and Michael J. Trebilcock. “Institutional Culture and Anti-Corruption Reform.” Journal of Law and Society 48, no. 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108563116
Perez, Michel A. “The Rise and Globalization of Negotiated Settlements: How an American Procedure, the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA), Became a Transnational Key Tool to Fight Transnational Corporate Crimes.” Rule of Law and Anti-Corruption Center Journal 2020, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5339/rolacc.2020.4
Pratama, Ilham Nur. “Legal Comparison of Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Methods in the USA, UK and Indonesia for Recovering State Financial Losses Due to Corruption Crimes.” Corruptio 4, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v4i2.2853
Stewart, Richard B. “Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance: Accountability, Participation, and Responsiveness.” American Journal of International Law 108, no. 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.2.0211
Stuntz, William J. “The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law.” Michigan Law Review 100, no. 3 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/1290411
Tuliakov, Viacheslav. “Transnational Criminal Law, Sovereignty and International Justice: Harmonization Challenges and Policy Evolution.” International Annals of Criminology 63, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1017/cri.2025.10076
Tyler, Tom R., and Jonathan Jackson. “Legitimacy and Procedural Justice.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 16 (2020). https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/29676
Yong, Gao. “A Comparative Study on Procedural Adjudication.” In Criminal Procedural Trial in China: Procedure of Excluding Illegal Evidence as an Example. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4935-5_3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Siti Adinda Nafirah, Nanda Yuniza Eviani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
