Pentingnya Transparansi Beneficial Ownership oleh Korporasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v8i2.1678Keywords:
Corporation, Benefical Owner, Transparency.Abstract
The development of the business world in Indonesia in the current modern era creates a new legal phenomenon that needs attention. This legal phenomenon is the existence of crimes that are hidden within the corporation. Therefore, Indonesia implements beneficial owner transparency for all corporations. Â The purpose of this study is to analyze the application of beneficial owners in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative juridical using the Theory of Law as a tool of social engineering by Roscoe Pound.
Based on the results of the study, it was found that the implementation of BO transparency in Indonesian corporations had not gone well. Only 8.3% percent of companies in Indonesia report BO, even though Indonesia has regulated the obligation to report BO in Presidential Decree No. 13 of 2018. This shows that the laws made have not been able to manipulate and or change people's behavior.
References
Buku
Arif, Barda Nawawi. (1996) Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Departemen Kehakiman. (2002) Masalah Pengaturan Terorisme Dan Perspektif Indonesia.
Jakarta: BPHN, Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM R.I.
FATF Guidance. (2014) Transparency and Beneficial Ownership.
Hamud M. Balfas. (2012) Hukum Pasar Modal Indonesia (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta : Tatanusa.
Lucky Suryo Wicaksono. (2014) Tinjauan Yuridis Kepastian Hukum Nominee Agreement
Kepemilikan Saham Perseroan Terbatas. Yogyakarta: Progam Pasca Sarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah mada.
Muladi dan Dwidja Priyanto. (2010) Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Munir Fuadi. (2013) Teori-Teori Besar (Grand Theory) Dalam Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana
Prennamdeia Group.
Sjahdeni, Sutan Remy. (2004) Seluk Beluk TPPU dan Pembiayaan Terorisme. Jakarta : PT
Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Jurnal
Erlina. (2020) ‘Analisis Regulasi Pemilik Manfaat (Beneficial Ownership) Pada Yayasan
Pendidikan’, Jurnal Al-Adl, 13 (1), p. 108.
Disemadi, H. S. (2019) ‘Risk Management in The Provision Of People’s Business Credit As
Implementation Of Prudential Principles’, Jurnal Diponegoro Law Review 4(2), p. 194- 208.
Fransiska Novita Elenora. (2011) ‘Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang’, Jurnal Hukum, 26(2), p. 640.
Kurniawan. (2014) ‘Tanggung Jawab Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas Menurut Hukum
Positif’, Jurnal Bagian Hukum Bisnis, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram, Mimbar Hukum 26 (1), p.78.
Nevey Varida Ariani. (2020) ‘Beneficial Owner: Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat Dalam Tindak
Pidana Korporasi’, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20 (1), p. 71.
Nurul Ihsan. (2013) ‘Tinjauan Mengenai Bentuk Perusahaan Dalam Konsep Ekonomi
Konvensional dan Fiqh Islam’, Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 3(1), p. 168.
Wenda Hartanto. (2016) ‘Analisis Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pendanaan Terorisme Pada Era
Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN’, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13 (4), p. 380.
Website
Achmad Dzulfadli Firdaus, “Tinjauan Pengaturan Pemilik Manfaat Terhadap Kepemilikan
Perseroan Terbatas Perbankan di Indonesia (Studi PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk), https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/56806/1/ACHMAD%20DZULFADLI%20FIRDAUS%20-%20FSH.pdf.
Fajar Widhiyanto, “Baru 22,36% Korporasi Terapkan Transparansi Beneficial Ownershipâ€,
Investor ID, https://investor.id/business/263689/baru-2236-korporasi-terapkan-transparansi-beneficial-ownership
Moch Dani Pratama Huzaini, “PPATK Ingatka, “Kemudahan Investasi Jangan Menjadi
Ruang Kejahatanâ€, www.hukumonline.com, Jakarta, 2019, dikunjungi pada 16 Desember 2019.
Yessyca Cyntia Rezeki, Skripsi Judul “Konstruksi Perbuatan Hukum…â€. Universitas Airlangga,
