Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of Child Abuse from a Child Protection Perspective in Sorong City

Authors

  • Selfianus Samolo LBH Perhimpunan Bantuan Hukum Keadilan dan Perdamaian
  • Muharudin Muharudin Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33506/jlj.v4i3.5081

Keywords:

Sanction Enforcement, Criminal Offenses, Violence Against Children

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role and effectiveness of the UPTD-PPA in addressing criminal acts of violence against children in Sorong City, particularly regarding the imposition of sanctions on perpetrators and legal protection for victims. The research method used is an empirical legal approach with a qualitative descriptive research design, which involves examining applicable legal provisions and assessing their implementation in practice through field data, interviews, and documentary analysis. The novelty of this study lies in its focus on the implementation of Regional Regulation No. 5 of 2022 as the operational basis for the UPTD-PPA in Sorong City, a topic that has not been extensively examined in previous research. Furthermore, there is a gap between normative regulations and on-the-ground implementation, particularly regarding resource constraints, inter-agency coordination, and low community participation in reporting cases, as well as identifying implementation barriers that hinder the optimization of child protection. Research findings indicate that the UPTD-PPA has played an active role in providing legal and psychological support to child victims of violence; however, the enforcement of sanctions against perpetrators still faces challenges, such as resource constraints, suboptimal interagency coordination, and low public awareness regarding the reporting of violence cases. Conclusion This study confirms that the existence of the UPTD-PPA is a progressive step in child protection; however, strengthening coordination, resources, and public awareness is necessary to ensure that law enforcement and child protection can function optimally.

References

Aji, Mas Toha Wiku. Praktik Pemaafan Hakim Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Edu Research Indonesian Institute For Corporate Learning And Studies (IICLS). Vol. 5, 2024.

Candra, Marli, Helga Nurmila Sari, and Marli Candra. “Punishment Pemidanaan Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam : Antara Fakta Dan Idealitas Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana Islam Disyariatkan Tujuan Utamanya Adalah Kemaslahatan , Yakni Yang Berorientasi Pada Tataran Duniawi ( Zawājir ), Dan Orientasi Pada Tataran Ukhrowī Sama ,” 2024.

Hutahaean, Bilher. “Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Anak.” Jurnal Yudisial 6, no. 1 (2013): 2. https://jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id/index.php/jy/article/view/119/103.

Iswari, Fauzi. “Aplikasi Konsep Negara Dan Reformasi Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Di Indonesia Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatra Barat” 6, no. September (2020): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.3376/jch.v6i1.285.

Kiling-Bunga, Beatriks Novianti, and Indra Yohanes Kiling. “Tinjauan Persepsi Anak Terhadap Kekerasan.” Journal of Health and Behavioral Science 1, no. 2 (2019): 83–97. https://doi.org/10.35508/jhbs.v1i2.2086.

Maidin, Gultom. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia.” ., n.d.

Pratama, Dimmas Prawira. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Anak Yang Mengakibatkan Korban Meninggal Dunia,” 2023, 78–92. http://repolib.unisri.ac.id/28/1/22101005 - Bakti Yuliadi.pdf.

Prisdawati, Renna, and Mukhtar Zuhdy. “Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 1, no. 3 (2021): 170–76. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v1i3.9609.

Ridlwan, Zulkarnain. “Negara Hukum Indonesia Kebalikan Nachtwachterstaat.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2014): 141–52. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v5no2.56.

Simamora, Janpatar. “Tafsir Makna Negara Hukum Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 14, no. 3 (2014): 547–61. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.3.318.

Sunandi, Diding. “Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Menyebabkan Luka Berat (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 255/Pid.B/2021/PN Mjl),” 2021.

Suryandi, Dody, Nike Hutabarat, and Hartono Pamungkas. “PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK Oleh : E-Mail :” 28, no. 35 (2020): 84–91.

Suryanto, Nono. “Implementasi Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Secara Bersama-Sama Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian (Studi Putusan Nomor: 141/Pid.B/2022/PN. Kndl),” 2021.

Syah S. Mohamad, Muzakir. “Hak Dan Kewajiban Warga Negara Dalam Negara Hukum: Dilema Implementasi Dan Reformasi Hukum Di Indonesia.” Judge : Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 03 (2025): 699–711. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i03.1485.

Tompodung, Hiro R. R. “KAJIAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN” 71, no. 1 (2021): 63–71.

Wahyudi, Rizki, and M Gaussyah. “Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Hal Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.” Mercatoria 11, no. 2 (2018): 174–96.

Yuwono, Ismantoro. “Memahami Beberapa Etika Profesi Dan Pekerjaan.” Lex Crimen II, no. 2 (2011): 43–55.

Downloads

Published

13-11-2026

How to Cite

Selfianus Samolo, and Muharudin Muharudin. 2026. “Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of Child Abuse from a Child Protection Perspective in Sorong City”. Journal of Law Justice (JLJ) 4 (3):248-62. https://doi.org/10.33506/jlj.v4i3.5081.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.