The Criminal Liability in the Context of Fertilizer Trade in Indonesia

Authors

  • Farida Luthfyana universitas muhammadiyah surakarta
  • Kuswardani Kuswardani Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Mazlena Binti Mohammad Hussain Internasional Islamic University Malaysia
  • Wahab Aznul Hidaya Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i3.3347

Keywords:

Business Activities, Crime, Indonesia Fertilizer, Trade

Abstract

Indonesia is an agricultural country and its agricultural sector which important in meeting food needs. On its journey, the agricultural sector in Indonesia is developing to improve the quality and production of food needs. Then, the fertilizer process has an important role in increasing the production of agricultural products, and the government needs to implement policies to subsidize the price of fertilizers for fertilizer distributors and arrange the regulations underlying the policy. If the fertilizer trade for fertilizer distributors is based on more than clear regulations, how can Indonesia's agricultural journey run. Thus, this study aims to attempt to describe the criminal liability of fertilizer trade based on court decisions at the first level up to the cassation level (namely, Decision Number. 137/pid.sus/2020/PN.Btg, Court of Appeal (Number. 487/Pid.Sus/2020/PT SMG and Cassation Decision Number. 78/Pid.Sus/2022). This study is normative research with a case approach, requiring secondary data in legal documents and references relevant to the subject matter. Data were collected by identification and inventory and then analyzed using the basic principles of criminal law. The novelty is fulfilling criminal liability is not enough regarding the psychological aspects (adult, healthy mind). However, it must also fulfill the normative measure of the act. The results showed that the defendant in the first instance and appellate level decisions were able to take liabilitybut was not sentenced because the element of the action in the prosecutor's charge, which stated "conducting trading business activities without having a license in the field of trade granted by the Ministry" was not fulfilled/proven, because the defendant had a trading business license (SIUP) issued by the Integrated Investment and Licensing Agency Number: 519/054/2014 dated June 04, 2014, under the name of the Agricultural Facilities and Organic Fertilizer Shop "Tani Jaya." The cassation verdict of the defendant can be held responsible and sentenced to punishment because measures from the psychological aspect are fulfilled. The measurements are from the normative aspect demanded by the public prosecutor, especially the elements that are also fulfilled. It can be consluded that based on the court's decision to measure the perpetrator's liability for a criminal offense, two measures must be met in imposing punishment.

References

Abdi, I., Fadillah, S., & Mamang, D. “ASPEK HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PENYIMPANAN/ BARANG KEBUTUHAN POKOK DAN BARANG PENTING (Studi Kasus Di Jakarta).” Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie 1, no. 2 (2019): 1–11.

Bachrie, E., M. Safitri, and A. Salsabila. “Implementasi Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Memproduksi Pupuk Kompos Merk Aneka Mitra Sejahtera(AMS) Yang Tidak Terdaptar (Studi Putusan Nomor:64/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Gns).” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 2 (2022): 4375–86.

Bancin, Intan Wulan Dari, and Nurul Jannah. “Analisis Minat Nasabah Pada Penggunaan Aplikasi BSI Mobile Dalam Pembayaran E-Commerce: Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Uinsu.” Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, Ekonomi Dan Manajemen (Jikem) 2, no. 2 (2022): 1487–99.

Darwis, Valeriana, and NFN Supriyati. “Subsidi Pupuk: Kebijakan, Pelaksanaan, Dan Optimalisasi Pemanfaatannya.” Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian 11, no. 1 (2016): 45. https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v11n1.2013.45-60.

Embang Herlambang, Deny Guntara, Muhamad Abas. “Optimalisasi Pengawasan Pengadaan Dan Penyaluran Pupuk Bersubsidi Dihubungkan Dengan Peraturan Menteri Nomor 4 Tahun 2023.” Jurnal Binamulia Hukum 12, no. 1 (2023): 47–56. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.37893/jbh.v12i1.328.

Faisal, Yahya. “SUBSIDIZED FERTILIZER RETAILERS’ COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT PRICING FROM TAS’IR AL-JABARI’S PERSPECTIVE (Research Study in Mutiara District, Pidie Regency).” Al-Iqtishadiah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 4, no. 1 (2023): 14–34.

Faris, Andhiya Moza, and Dian Rachmat Gumelar. “Right To Be Forgotten as an Effort to Suppress Recidivism Rate of Theft Crime” 10, no. May (2024): 358–72.

Hamidah, Siti, Eka Yulyana, and Evi Priyanti. “Distribusi Pupuk Bersubsidi Di Kabupaten Karawang.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 8, no. July (2022): 156–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6791738.

Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.

Hiarriej, Eddy O.S. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.

I Putu Bagus Eko Hadhi Santosa, I Made Arjaya Dan I Nengah Laba. “Aspek Hukum Tuntutan Jaksa Penuntut Umum Tentang Tindak Pidana Pemerasan Dan Pengancaman.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 88–92.

Ibrahim, Muhammad Yusuf. “Pemberian Pupuk Bersubsidi Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perlindungan Dan Pemberdayaan Petani.” Fenomena 19, no. 2 (2021): 125. https://doi.org/10.36841/fenomena.v19i2.1464.

Imansyah, S K, and A D Sumaryanto. “Trading in Influence as a Crime in Indonesia Criminal Law System: A Juridical Study.” Yuris (Journal of Court and … 1, no. 2 (2022). https://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/jcj/article/view/107%0Ahttps://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/jcj/article/download/107/109.

Kartiko, Kuswardani & Gilang. "Asas Kesalahan Dalam Hukum Pidana Pilar Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia”, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Online & Call For Paper. Universitas Surya Kencana. UNSUR PRESS, n.d.

Ketaren, Amiruddin, and Rakhmadsyah Putra Rangkuty. “Kajian Pembangunan Ketahanan Pangan Keluarga Petani.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM) 2, no. 2 (2021): 218. https://doi.org/10.29103/jspm.v2i2.5646.

Lievia Wijaya, Yuan, and Syaifuddin Zuhdi. “Animals as Criminal Evidence in the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law.” Justisi 10, no. 2 (2024): 315–27. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i2.2912.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.

Muhammad Adystia Sunggara, Yang Meliana, Wahab Aznul Hidaya, Sokhib Nain, Mawrni Fatma. “Dinamika Hukum Dan Korupsi Politik (Dampak Dan Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia).” Unizar Law Review 7, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36679/ulr.v7i1.64.

Musjtari, Dewi Nurul. “Dampak Liberalisasi Perdagangan Dalam WTO Agreement Terhadap Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia.” Kanun - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 16, no. 2 (2014): 221–46.

Ningsih, Nur Prasetya. “Criminological Analysis of Child Victims of Exploitation as Drug Couriers in Sorong City” 2, no. 2 (2024): 133–49.

Pratama, Danu Bagus. “Pendistribusian Pupuk Bersubsidi Yang Berimplikasi Tindak Pidana Ekonomi.” Jurnal Rechtens 9, no. 2 (2020): 197–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36835/rechtens.v9i2.794.

Putirulan, Benhur Raubert, Kristi Warista Simanjuntak, and Paul Przemysław. “Settlement of the Malamoi Community Customary Land Dispute in Sorong Regency : A Review of Legal and Social Aspects” 2, no. 2 (2024): 96–110.

Radita Ajie. “Kriminalisasi Perbuatan Pengayaan Diri Pejabat Publik Secara Tidak Wajar ( Illicit Enrichment ) Dalam Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi 2003 ( UNCAC ) Dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 12, no. 3 (2018): 1–23.

Ragimun, Makmun, Sigit Setiawan. “Strategi Penyaluran Pupuk Bersubsidi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah M-Progress 10, no. 1 (2020): 69–89. https://doi.org/10.35968/m-pu.v10i1.369.

Serlika Aprita, Serlika Aprita. “Peranan Peer to Peer Lending Dalam Menyalurkan Pendanaan Pada Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 16, no. 1 (2021): 37–61. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v16i1.3407.

Sugiono, Sugiono, and Siti Faridatul Gufroniah. “Pendistribusian Pupuk Bersubsidi Dengan Acuan Rencana Definitif Kebutuhan Kelompok (RDKK) Perspektif Etika Bisnis.” Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah 5, no. 1 (2022): 371–85. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v5i1.1465.

Tulus, Richard, Eko Soponyono, and Laila Mulasari. “Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Ekonomi (Studi Kasus Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penimbunan Pangan).” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 2 (2016): 1–18. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/10753.

Widiatmoko, Kukuh. “PENGGELEDAHAN DAN PENYITAAN TERHADAP BARANG BUKTI TINDAK PIDANA DI BIDANG PANGAN.” Lex Crimen 10, no. 4 (2021): 43–53.

Downloads

Published

27-08-2024

How to Cite

Farida Luthfyana, Kuswardani, K., Hussain, M. B. M., & Hidaya, W. A. (2024). The Criminal Liability in the Context of Fertilizer Trade in Indonesia. JUSTISI, 10(3), 672–681. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i3.3347

Issue

Section

Articles