Studi Komparasi Implementasi dan Tantangan Kebijakan Otonomi Daerah di Sumatera dan Papua

Authors

  • Jamaluddin Jamaluddin Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • M Najeri Al Syahrin Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v10i1.3349

Keywords:

comparison, implementation, challenges, regional autonomy, decentralization

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the implementation of regional autonomy policy by taking the case of comparison between the islands of Sumatra and Papua. The research method uses the literature study method to collect various information relevant to the qualitative approach. This approach is considered appropriate because the implementation of regional autonomy is multi-dimensional. The implementation of regional autonomy in Sumatra and Papua over the past two decades has not been able to significantly improve welfare, especially in reducing poverty and improving education, health, and economic infrastructure. The success rate of implementing regional autonomy in the Sumatra region from the aspect of regional competitiveness is 18.30% and has not been successful enough to increase regional competitiveness in terms of GDP per capita. In addition, the implementation of regional autonomy mainly in conflict areas, the level of conflict in Aceh decreased significantly after regional autonomy was enacted. From an average of 1,500 deaths per year in the period 1999-2005 to an average of 50 deaths per year in the period 2006-2018. While the level of conflict in Papua increased significantly after regional autonomy was imposed, from an average of 100 deaths per year in the period 1999-2005 to an average of 300 victims killed per year in the period 2006-2018. In Sumatra, particularly in Aceh, regional autonomy is successful because it involves the participation and consensus of all parties involved, including former rebels, civil society, and the central government. In Papua, regional autonomy fails because it is carried out unilaterally and authoritatively by the central government, without regard for the interests and rights of the Papuan people.

References

Aminah, A., Gantyowati, E., Winarna, J., & Redaputri, A. P. 2021. Implementation of The Effectiveness of Regional Autonomy in Indonesia. JEJAK, 14(1), 123-133.

Arifin, F. 2020. Juridic-Empiric Factors the Reason for Removal of Regional Head Official Position in Regional Government Systems in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(5), 557-567.

Barter, S. J., & Wangge, H. R. 2022. Indonesian Autonomies: Explaining Divergent Self-Government Outcomes in Aceh and Papua. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 52(1), 55-81.

Dewi, E., & Nurzalikha, S. 2018. Returning Government Policy for Poverty Reduction in Aceh. IX (31), 40-49.

Engkus, E., Hoerudin, C. W., & Maolani, D. Y. 2019. Supervision and control of the government internal supervisory apparatus in the implementation of regional autonomy. International Journal of Science and Society, 1(1), 56-69.

Fahmi, M., & Purnamadewi, Y. L. 2020. The Impact of Disparity in Infrastructure Development on Aceh ’ s Economic Performance : An Inter-Provincial Analysis. 66 (2),141–156.

Guritno, D. C., Samudro, B. R., & Soesilo, A. M. 2019. The paradox of political dynasties of regeneration type and poverty in the regional autonomy era. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(2), 179-194.

Jakani, A. H., Arifin, A., Tang, M., & Ibrahim, M. A. 2023. The form of regional autonomy implemented by the governor of Gorontalo province. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 8(1), 060-065.

Kambu, Y. 2019. Kehadiran Negara melalui Otonomi Khusus di Papua: Studi Kasus Dampak Otsus Pada Ekonomi Orang Asli Papua). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53 (9),1689-1699.

Mahoro, J. C. G., & Samekto, F. A. 2021. Barriers to the Enforcement of Environmental Law: An Effect of Free Market Domination and Regional Autonomy in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, 7(1), 31-45.

Maulana, A., Utami, C., & Hanafi, L. I. 2022. The Progress of Regional Autonomy Policy and Development Attainments: Indonesia's Experience (1999-2021). Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 19(1), 95-111.

Moonti, R. M. 2019. Regional Autonomy in Realizing Good Governance. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 2(1), 43-53.

Nashrullah, J., & Lohalo, G. O. 2022. The Establishment of a New Autonomous Region of Papua in State Administrative Law Perspective. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 145-159.

Prabowo, H. 2020. Regional Autonomy Oversight Models in Denmark and Zimbabwe and Alternative Regional Autonomy Oversight Model in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 12(1), 64-74.

Radjab, S. 2013. Problem hak asasi manusia dalam pelaksanaan otonomi daerah. Al-Daulah, 2 (2), 223–240.

Resosudarmo, B. P., Mollet, J. A., Raya, U. R., & Kaiwai, H. 2014. Development in Papua after special autonomy. Regional Dynamics in a Decentralized Indonesia, 433–459.

Rodiyah, R., Arifin, R., & Steven, S. 2020. Local Autonomy and Federalism: How Indonesia Deal with Democracy in Global Governance?. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 15(2), 342-358.

Sabara, A. R. 2022. Regional Autonomy In The Political System And Authority In Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Review, 7(2), 296-311.

Setiawan, H., Choirunnisa, C., & Ningrum, R. P. 2022) Tantangan Dua Dekade Otonomi Khusus Aceh dan Papua: Distorsi atau Peluang?. Journal of Governance and Local Politics (JGLP), 4(2), 125-135.

Sukarniati, L., Ramadhona, F., & Lubis, A. 2004. Determinants of Local Original Income The Era of Special Autonomy for the Government of Aceh Province. 11(1), 93-107.

Published

2024-06-07

How to Cite

Jamaluddin, J., & Al Syahrin, M. N. (2024). Studi Komparasi Implementasi dan Tantangan Kebijakan Otonomi Daerah di Sumatera dan Papua. Jurnal Noken: Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 10(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v10i1.3349