Optimizing Signage Material Decision Making at PT XYZ with AHP-TOPSIS

Authors

  • Marlina Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Asep Endih Nurhidayat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Famelga Clea Putri Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33506/mt.v10i1.2769

Keywords:

AHP, Decision Making, Material, Topsis

Abstract

  1. XYZ company in the field of signage design consulting services has product output in the form of the best design recommendations. Output recommendations in design include material selection. However, several times it was found that the recommended materials were not appropriate, such as signage being corrosive. This is because there are factors that are not taken into consideration when making decisions. Factors influencing material selection and a list of material alternatives were identified by conducting interviews with experts who were directly involved in decision making. This research uses the AHP method (Analytical Hierarchy Process method) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and is assisted by Super Decision software. This research uses the AHP method (Analytical Hierarchy Process method) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and is assisted by Super Decision software. The research results show that there are 6 main criteria used in selecting signage making materials, namely, price, quality, availability, durability, ease of processing and processing speed. Weighting using AHP produces an order of importance for each criterion from highest to lowest, namely availability (0.2269), processing speed (0.2216), durability (0.2182), ease of processing (0.1519), quality (0.0919) and price (0.0895). The results of data processing using TOPSIS show that acrylic has the greatest preference for use as a material for making signage with a weight of 0.6569. The research results can be used as a reference for decision making in selecting signage materials with a measurable process.

References

Afif Buchori, M. (2018). Decision Support System of Granting Loan at Cooperative Keluarga Besar Mustain Using Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika, 2(1), 20–26.

Andjani, L. N. A., & Setiadarma, W. (2017). Perancangan Sign System CV. Alam Hijau Selaras. Jurnal Pendidikan Seni Rupa, 05, 141–148.

Calori, C., & Vanden-Eynden, D. (2015). Signage and Wayfinding Design: A Complete Guide to Creating Environmental Graphic Design Systems. New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons

Ganet Dirgantara. (2022, Desember 2). Periset Pastikan Sektor Konstruksi Tetap Tumbuh pad 2023. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3281319/periset-pastikan-sektor-konstruksi-tetap-tumbuh-pada-2023.

Ibrahim, A., Alang, A. H., Madi, Baharuddin, Ahmad, M. A., & Darmawati. (2018). Metodologi Penellitian. Jakarta: Gunadarma Ilmu.

Kusnandar, V. B. (2022). Didukung Belanja Pemerintah, Sektor Konstruksi Tumbuh 2,81% pada 2021. Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/03/11/didukung-belanja-pemerintah-sektor-konstruksi-tumbuh-281-pada-2021

Indrasari, Y. (2020). Efesiensi Saluran Distribusi Pemasaran Kopi Rakyat di Desa Gending Waluh Kecamatan Sempol (Ijen) Bondowoso. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 14(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.9744/pemasaran.14.1.44─50

Munthafa, A. E., & Mubarok, H. (2017). Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi. Jurnal Siliwangi, 3(2), 192–201.

Supriadi, A., dkk. (2018). Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Published

24-03-2024

How to Cite

Marlina, Nurhidayat, A. E., & Putri, F. C. (2024). Optimizing Signage Material Decision Making at PT XYZ with AHP-TOPSIS. Metode : Jurnal Teknik Industri, 10(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.33506/mt.v10i1.2769