ANALISIS HUBUNGAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI (Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Kecamatan Ruing Kabupaten Ngada NTT)

Rais Dera Pua Rawi(1),
(1) 

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Noken

DOI : https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v2i2.29

Full Text:    Language : id
Submitted : 2017-11-19
Published : 2017-11-20

Abstract


This study aims to determine the Relationship Motivation Against Employees Performance at the Office District Riung Ngada NTT, both partially and to determine which variables are most dominantly related to employee performance. Approach used in this study is Cross Sectional Study, with research type is research Analytical Survey .. Population as well as samples in this study as many as 30 employees at the district office Riung Ngada district NTT.The results showed that (1) There is a significant relationship incentive with the performance of employees at the district office Riung Ngada NTT. This is indicated by Chi-square value 4,176 ≥ 3,841. (2) No significant relationship Allowance with employee performance at the Rinung sub-district office Ngada NTT.Hal is shown with the value of Chi-square 0,517 <3.841. (3) There is no significant correlation of reward with employee performance at Riung District office of Ngada District NTT.Hal is shown by Chi-square 2,308 <3,841. The statistic test with Chi-square shows that incentives are highly related to 4.176%. As for the variable allowance of 0,517% and the variable of appreciation 2,308%, these two variables are not related to employee performance.


References


Arifin (2005) Pengaruh Motivasi dan Kemampuan kerja terhadap Kinerja dan Kepuasan kerja karyawan PT Satu Nusa Persada Batam.

Ghozali, Imam. 2001. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS Badan Penerbit Undip, Semarang.

Haminati Sharikha, Aan Permana, 2012.“Pengaruh Pemberian Insentif Terhadap Kinerja Pustakawan Di Perpustakaan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Tengah.”Diakses September 2012.

Handoko.T. Hani. 2001. Manajemen Personalia dan SDM. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Hasibuan, S. P. Malayu. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

H.Jakson, Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Kinerja 2001.

Ismail,Sukidarfi.(2003).HubunganKemampuandanMotivasiDenganKinerjaPegawaiPusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Departemen Kehakimandan HAM RI.Depok: Universitas Indonesia.

Mangkunegara, Prabu. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Cetakan ke-2. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Nawawi Handani, 2008,MetodePenelitian Ekonomi, Erlangga, Jakarta.

Robert L, Malthis & Jhon H. Lackson 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, (Bisnis, Manajemen, keuangan, dan SDM). Edisi 9. Jakarta :Salemba Siagian, Sondang P. 2002. Kiat Meningkatkan Prestasi Kerja. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Ruky, Achmad. 2002. Sistem Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Sasmita. 2002. Demokrasi dan Falsafah Pemimpin adalah untuk Bawahannya.

Sedarmayanti. S. 2004. Good Governance (kepemimpinan yang baik).

Sugiyono, 2003. Metode Penelitian Administrasi, Bandung Alfabeta .

-----------, 2009. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Al Fabeta.

Wibowo. 2009. Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Raja Grapindo Persada.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 152 times
 PDF Downloaded : 30 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.